The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Have United States helped to create Isis and Islamic terrorism?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Andrea25 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/18/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 479 times Debate No: 94813
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)




Of course, they have. Islamic terrorism is a monster created by U.S foreign policy. If you think that Hillary Clinton's statements (as well as Donald Trump's ones) were just part of their electoral propaganda, I could disappoint you in the second round.


I accept.

BoP Analysis: Pro must argue that US policies helped create both ISIS and Islamic terrorism. Though it is nearly impossible for Pro to prove the latter, the structure of the resolution which Pro constructed makes this the case.

I am interested to see how Pro is able to argue that the US created jihadist ideaology.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by malalo75 2 years ago
More than 5 years?
Since you were 11?

Prove it's true. That video proves nothing.

Good luck with your debate, but I think you're simply a conspiracy theory troll.
Posted by Andrea25 2 years ago
I know it's true, and I'm saying this even before Isis would have become what it is now. Helping rebels in Syria, the United States have helped Isis. I haven't' find anything on Internet and thought that "it has to be true". Sadly it IS true. It's more than 5 years that I support this thesis.

Do you want some official document? Are you looking for proofs? Here you are...
Posted by malalo75 2 years ago
The website Pro linked to is only a set of lines. No proof, nothing.
Even what appears to be a Youtube link is in fact a link another website.

So Pro is basically using the "it's written on the Internet, so it has to be true" argument.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.