History Revisited #001: Jamestown Colony Should Have Failed
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 3/17/2014 | Category: | Miscellaneous | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 3,387 times | Debate No: | 49105 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (15)
Votes (1)
This is the first debate in a series which I call "History Revisited." I as Pro will be arguing that the early period of Jamestown colony from 1607-1627 should of seen the colony fail. I am arguing that the colony's probability of survival was low. The Jamestown Colony seemed to survive based on chance versus a solid plan. Con must argue that the Jamestown colony had a high chance of success or a solid chance at success. Round 1: Acceptance Only. |
![]() |
I would like to thank Con for accepting this debate. Best of luck. The following four reasons are why I think Jamestown Colony had a low chance of survival: 1. The Lack of Discipline- "He who does not work, will not eat." The above is the infamous Biblical phrase often attributed to Captain John Smith during his time in Jamestown Colony. John SMith was elected as leader of Jamestown colony in 1608. John Smith helped maintain the colony from 1608-1609[1]. The colonists failed to work hard before John Smith and after him[2]. John Smith was notable for bringing the discipline the colony lacked. I will explain later how the lack of discipline resulted in a low chance of survival. [1]http://apva.org... [2]Jamestown Colony: A Political, Social, and Cultural History By Frank E. Grizzard 2. The Lack of Necessary People The colony lacked the necessary people to have a sucessful colony in the early period of Jamestown we are discussing. A significant amount of the early settlers were "gentlemen." These "gentlemen" did not engage in hard work. The only useful people were soldiers, laborers, and fishermen. The useful people were a minority as you will see in the passenger list. If you read the passenger list, you notice most of the passengers were "gentlemen" who were in search of riches. [3]http://www.nps.gov... 3. The Overreliance on Powhatans Since the Jamestown settlers were not familiar with the "New World" or how to survive in it. The settlers had to learn from the Powhatans about how to survive. The Powhatans were the local Indian tribe. But the settlers(the "gentlemen") refused to learn how to survive and farm for themselves. In the winter, settlers would have to trade with the Indians[4]. [4]http://www.jamestown1607.org... 4.The results of all three. The settlers would starve in the winter because they were unprepared for it. People would go on to resort to cannibalism in order to survive[5]. Between 1609 and 1610, 90% of the settlers died[6]. This was known as the "Starving time." The settlers in Jamestown in the early period that we are debating had a low probability of surviving and the starving in the long winters is the best representation of it. [5]http://www.smithsonianmag.com... [6]http://www.pbs.org... I will elaborate further on all four points in the next round. I will especially focus more on the role of the Powhatans and how they went to war with the Jamestown settlers. ConservativePolitico forfeited this round. |
![]() |
Tophatdoc forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
Tophatdoc forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
Post a Comment
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Tophatdoc 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by MolecularBird06 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Tophatdoc 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by tomricotta 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Gordontrek 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Tophatdoc 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Jifpop09 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Tophatdoc 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by saxman 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Tophatdoc 7 years ago

Report this Comment
12Next »
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by WilliamsP 7 years ago
Tophatdoc | ConservativePolitico | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: It seems this debate was worthless.