The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Homosexual Marriage

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/10/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 617 times Debate No: 101864
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)


In this argument, my challenger will argue that same sex marriage should not be legal.
1.(of a person) sexually attracted to people of one's own sex.
1.a person who is sexually attracted to people of their own sex
1.the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship (historically and in some jurisdictions specifically a union between a man and a woman).
"a happy marriage"
synonyms:wedding, wedding ceremony, marriage ceremony, nuptials, union
"the marriage took place at St. Margaret's"
2.a combination or mixture of two or more elements.
"a marriage of jazz, pop, blues, and gospel"

First round is definitions/acceptance
Second round is reason(s) you think same sex marriage should not be legal (worldwide)
Third round is addressing the opponents reasons
Fourth is freestyle
You have 3 days to submit your completed argument, If you fail to do so within 72 hours the argument will cease.


Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the creation and education of children and continuing of humanity..

The promoters of same-sex "marriage" propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementary in marriage. If everything went their way, then Humanity would end in a few generations. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage. To have children, raise them and continue humanity.

Same sex marriage is not the way humans are supposed to get married, as dictated by God. God says that a man marries a woman. Just because monkeys do it does not mean we should. We are intellectually superior to animals. We have more complex minds than animals, which think "eat,drink,sleep".

The best interests of a child is that he or she has a both mother and a father. He will be raised by someone with no blood relation with him. Same Sex Marriage is against the best interests of a child.

Homosexual activists argue that same-sex "marriage" is a civil rights issue similar to the struggle for equality in all races.

First of all, sexual behavior and race are essentially different realities. A man and a woman wanting to marry may be different in their characteristics: one may be black, the other white; one rich, the other poor; or one tall, the other short. None of these makes it so they cannot marry, but same sex marriage goes against human nature.

Secondly, inherited and unchangeable racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. There is simply no analogy between the interracial marriage of a man and a woman and the "marriage" between two individuals of the same sex. It would never work out biologically for a man to have a baby with another one.

It Imposes Its Acceptance on All of Society. People might not think that it is a good idea, as most of the USA does. However, it is becoming a requirement to teach that it should be accepted, and if you are against it, you get punished. This is a kind of mental oppression, as the secularists are taking control of our education system, and are trying to force us to believe everything that they say. Same Sex marriage is an objective moral; it will always be wrong, whether it is a thousand years in the future, or a thousand years in the past. It offends God, and therefore it must be wrong.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by John_C_1812 3 years ago
This debate has requirements acting as limit on who can take part in the debate.
Posted by uzairmahmud 3 years ago
How come the website won't let me be the Contender?
Posted by John_C_1812 3 years ago
Why must we care if two men are entering a public contact, it happens verbally every day. BiniVir.
Why must we care if two woman enter a public contact it happens verbally every day. Unosmulier.
Let one of of them lie as to their true nature and the fact is recorded to the claim that was made before all witness.

So help you axiom of GOD.
Posted by John_C_1812 3 years ago
Quick point it is not legal, it is a complex crime, it is a hard crime define easily establish in a Court of law. The crime is a United States Constitutional issue and the United States Constitution can be protected under the First Amendment. Freedom of press meaning the United States Constitution holds no self-value and thus Impartiality may need to be assigned to insure its representation to the public.

However it is much easier to object on basic principle legally, we are asked to witness. A Gay marriage is Binivir and a lesbian marriage is UnosMulier, under objection of a sex expectation is illegal to transfer onto a witness in a public contract without clear boundary. A Likely-hood long standing for precedent is being challenged, Marriage clearly does not translate a sexual expectation or accusation. The joke is discrimination is claimed to the take place at level that protects an open plagiarism.

The crime is against the United States Constitution and is not dissolved by the legislation or accusation of discrimination. As it has never been established in any reasonable way the Gay or Lesbian are also accusation with criminal intent when plagiarizing Marriage.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.