Homosexuality

i dont wanna long debate like you people do on here just keep it simple ok?????!? the limit is going to be only 2000 characters cause of that cause people go overboard, 2 rounds that it!!!

i am against homos because in the bible it says clearly they are not to be permitted. god is all knowing, he cant be wrong about this -- from the first source

homos/gays are also disproportionately pedophiles. they are so small in our population and yet they are still close to 20-30% of registered pedos -- from the second source

gays effect the family unit,, how will we reproduce if they take over. if their agenda succeeds, america will die. period.

first source
http://christianity.about.com...
second source
http://www.frc.org...

good luck opponent

my opponent just criticized me for citing what he thinks is a bias source but he linked to a source which is obviously also bias, it has an lgbt banner at the top of the webpage

this guy im debating wants to trick you through lying. good for him for being so convincing, but hes arguing for the wrong side, that video you posted is in favour of my side of the debate, warning about pedophilia in homosexuals. thanx for the informational warning,not sure what thats about

so pro didnt give response to my pedophilia bit

also, the APA is an organization extremely influenced by liberal media pressure. the family research council holds its ground from the beginning. APA is all over the place. when america is majority conservative, theyll switch to being anti gay to appease people.

sexuality is NOT a choice you think babies have sexual thoughts? I know 100% its a choice because i chose to be straight

also there is supposed to be not round 3 but i guess we will do it. only ending parts in round 3, nothing new like round 2 and 1 or else you lose

so, summary: my opponent linked to an lgbt source, the apa which can't be trusted due to all constnat pressure from the liberal media and the gay agenda, and given a confusing youtube video as a refute for my pedophilia argument that actually is my favor because it shows gays are dangerous.

Very, very brief Arguments

1. Homosexuality is not a bad thing. It is equivalent to a skin colour or a physical apperance. It's something that people cannot control, despite what con claims about himself. People should not be judged on their sexuality, but upon if they are a gay black jewish clansman. joke <3


2. From a non-emotional or moral standpoint, homosexuality could be a factor in decreasing the ever increasing birth rate and the inflated population.


Rebuttals to.. whatever con is trying to say

1. LGBT flag in my source There is an extreme difference in bias between displaying an LGBT flag and having a reputation as being one of the most anti-gay organizations in America. My source does not manipulate evidence in it's favour and uses logic in it's reasoning. Since my support is summarizing studies that affirm that homosexuality is not able to be correlated with choice of orientation or pedophilia, it has the right to wave that flag in affirmation of it's findings.

Here is my source again, btw, because it seems the link is broken to me, don't know how con got it:
(http://psychology.ucdavis.edu...)

2. The video - Oh, goodness.

The purpose of the video was to illustrate the origins of the myth that homosexuality and pedophilia are correlated. It's a propaganda video meant for small-minded people. The fact that you interpreted it as "evidence against LGBT people" speaks words.

3. Reliability of the APA - Con has made some big claims about the legitimacy of the APA, pretty much suggesting that it is corrupt, fake, and totally unreliable. Unfortunately for him, he's failed sto supply any proof of this.

4. Babies want hot, delicious sex - It's a known fact that all babies love sex. Don't know what con is getting at here. No, but seriously, the experiences and possible illusions of one person (TrueChristian) speaks nothing to the status of an entire sexual orientation.

Try comments for source if not working. Maybe its just me.

well my opponent for some reason decided to join a gay kkk. this does not help his argument, he is proving he is the true phobic one here

also, who are you to say a video is propaganda, you didnt make it, you have to source that or prove

also, do YOU KNOW MY BRAIN? you are CLAIMING that you know my CHOICES better than i do. i was born void of sexual preference, im not some sort of freak baby fetish pedophile. my preferences matured as god intended, I did not commit this sin, although I have sinned we have all sined, I did not deviate from my path and i am straight, i chose it. i chose to be straight and accept jesus.

let jesus have mercy on your soul. accept him into your heart and you will be permitted to the gates of heaven romans 10:9, john 3:16

i should win this debate because the pro here is affiliating with the kkk and being irelevant to the debate, he also is tricking the voters on purpose with misleading videos.

if you are a godo christian, vote for con in thsi debate please.

all christian voters, remember your savior