The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

I Will Lose This Debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/29/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 596 times Debate No: 84391
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)




R1- Acceptance
R2- Arguments
R3- Refutations
R4- Conclusion


I simply forfeit the debate: for I have no idea what it even is. I assume this is a joke, that i've sadly ruined. Sorry. Joining the debate was simply pointless. I apologize.
Debate Round No. 1


SO I automatically win :)


Yes, which is exactly why I will win; for I lost this debate.
Debate Round No. 2


The three possible scenarios:

1. You get the most points. Therefore, I lost, I should win.

2. I get the most points. I won the debate. Not lost it. Therefore, you should get the points. But if you should get the points, than I lose.

3. Tie. I did not lose the debate

Overall, there are 3 possible scenarios. 2 of them revolve around me losing. If I lose, I win.


Goddamn it, every time I think of a loophole It can easily be proven wrong. You win the debate. I resign from giving myself
and more headaches. Congratulations; you've won the debate since I resign.
Debate Round No. 3


mrpotatowaffles forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by snkcake666 2 years ago
Well looks like the tie just broke the paradox.
Posted by BlazingRodent 2 years ago
*voting for

I had no idea why I put "resulting in" there for.
Posted by BlazingRodent 2 years ago
A total paradox and complete fallacy. By posting voting period someone has to lose.

If you lose, you win = you win, you lose

So you have just as good of a change winning as you do losing, which means if we are to use this fallacy as a logical argument, you should technically tie since both of you are right.

To prevent confusion, I am pretty sure voters will pick you because Con ff'd. Using the fallacy as a logical appeal to the debate would result in voters resulting in whoever they feel like just because of their perspective of the paradox assuming that they take it seriously.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by pimpmaster 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: The debate was quite deep for something with such a small discussion. The topic of the debate was if Pro would lose this debate. It was up to pro to make the case and prove his position. Con did what Pro should have done, resign. Pro's resignation and refusal to complete in round 4 was in stark contrast to Pro's ability to prove the point. Typically I would vote for the person who completed the debate, however this was proven by Con to be a more convincing argument against Pro's position. Neither did much, so the only point I give was for the person After the debate. Funny and interesting.