I think the movie Jurassic Park is not scary.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
SPENCERJOYAGE14
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 3/19/2014 | Category: | Movies | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,039 times | Debate No: | 49465 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
There's no other choice, lol |
![]() |
The first time I watched Jurassic Park I was 6 years old, when I watched it I laughed because I thought Barney was scarier then the dinosaurs in this movie. Through that short story I have fulfilled my burden of proof, that I believe Jurassic Park is not scary.
When looking at Jurassic park, the possibilities being presented are frightening. While it might not be possible to fully extract the dinosaur genome from ancient mosquitoes embedded in amber, it's possible to reconstruct it with chicken embryos according to Palaeontologist Jack Horner. While the dinosaur might not be complete, the idea is still scary. |
![]() |
I think you misunderstood this resolution. The rez is that: I think Jurassic Park is not scary. Because I actually think Jurassic Park is not scary I have fulfilled my burden of proof. Now you have to prove why I don't think it is scary. Vote for me.
People don't listen to Spencerjoyage14. Do you think that a T-rex attempting to tourists in the cars isn't scary? Ask yourself, what if you were being chased by T-rex and velocoraptors who are skilled hunters which can run faster than you can? I think SpencerJoyage should have all the more reason to be scared than she claims she does. |
![]() |
Now the Truth-Seeker doesn't want you to listen to me or to vote for me on this debate because he is scared he has lost. I have proved my side of the argument and he has not. Vote for me. Thanks.
She knows i'm right deep down inside and if she saw a real dinosaur, she'd be scared, lol. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Kc1999 7 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14 | Truth_seeker | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 1 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Really, I don't know who to give points to. Both sides attacked each other, and some arguments were kettle logic, but at the end, I feel like pro had better conduct, and that was the only thing I could give points too, because Con started the personal attack