All Big Issues
The Instigator
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

# Is A Two Dimensional Object Possible?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1

Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Crescendo
 Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point Started: 4/14/2014 Category: Science Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period Viewed: 978 times Debate No: 52466
Debate Rounds (3)

 Con My opponent may post during the first round, burden of proof is shared.Report this Argument Pro DUH!! Want to see a two dimensional object? print up this argument on your printer!! Report this Argument Con Before we begin, let us define 2-D and 3-D. Definition of 2-Dimensional: http://www.mathsisfun.com... Definition of 3-Dimensional: http://www.mathsisfun.com... A 2-D object is missing a dimension, whether it be length, width, or height. Now what happens if a 3-D object has a dimension lessened? Well, that object will get thinner in a certain direction. If that dimension were to shrink completely, that object would become thinner and thinner and then it would disappear. Note that according to the definition of 3-D provided it said that all real-world objects are 3-D. My opponent references to a thin sheet of printed paper. But what my opponent does not see is that this piece of paper has all three dimensions intact. That other dimension is simply very thin. Even an object on a computer screen is actually 3-D, as it is composed out of electricity and light, which contains all three dimensions, albeit on a VERY, VERY small scale. Unless my opponent brings forth an utterly brilliant counter-argument proving that 2-D objects do in fact exist, then there is no point in debating this. More Suggested Reading: https://answers.yahoo.com...Report this Argument Pro BURP. I just ATE my opponent's arguments. LOLOL Now let me show you what's left of them!!!! There is absolutely NOTHING impossible with there being a 2dimensional object!!! Do they violate any LAWS OF LOGIC?? NO!!! So they are POSSIBLe. ALL I need to show is that they COULD EXIST!!!! MY OPPONENT needs to show that they CANNOT exist. PERIOD. Ever heard of modal logic??!? If something is NOT impossible, then it exists in SOME possiblr world. This means its POSSIBLE. AND THERES IS NOTHING IMPOSSIBLE ABOUT 2D OBJECTS!!! SO WE SHOULD THINK THEYA RE AT LEAST POSSIBLE!!! Unless my clown LOSER opponent can prtove otherwise!!! hahahahaha!Report this Argument Con "There is absolutely NOTHING impossible with there being a 2dimensional object!!! Do they violate any LAWS OF LOGIC?? NO!!!" Instead of doing this, please provide a rational and logical rebuttal to my contention. "So they are POSSIBLe. ALL I need to show is that they COULD EXIST!!!! MY OPPONENT needs to show that they CANNOT exist. PERIOD." I suppose so. Of course, my opponent needs to keep in mind that: A. Burden of Proof is shared B. I can still prove that whatever 2-D object he mentions is actually a 3-D object "Ever heard of modal logic??!? If something is NOT impossible, then it exists in SOME possiblr world. This means its POSSIBLE." For this argument to be valid, my opponent must prove: A. That the very laws of the Universe are different in other universes. B. That the Multiverse Theory is true. "AND THERES IS NOTHING IMPOSSIBLE ABOUT 2D OBJECTS!!! SO WE SHOULD THINK THEYA RE AT LEAST POSSIBLE!!!" Instead of making claims like this, please provide an adequate rebuttal to my claims. "Unless my clown LOSER opponent can prtove otherwise!!! hahahahaha!" Despite what my opponent may say, I suspect strongly that his purpose here (pertaining to this debate) is to troll.Report this Argument Pro invisibledeity forfeited this round.
8 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Posted by SeventhProfessor 7 years ago
He has a REALLY nice fedora.
Posted by Berend 7 years ago
Is there something about ID I am unaware of?
Posted by queenofmayhem 7 years ago
I think I lost brain cells, thanks pro.

Con, I offer you my utmost sympathy.
Posted by invisibledeity 7 years ago
RIGHT. Because I am OBLITERATING him!!! LOLOL
Posted by SeventhProfessor 7 years ago
Bubba, just challenge Berend to this debate once this one is over. You'll get nowhere with ID.
Posted by Berend 7 years ago
Damn beat me too it.
Posted by invisibledeity 7 years ago
LOL! you know you will lose!
Posted by Crescendo 7 years ago
Aw crap, not this guy...
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.