Is Abortion Morally Correct?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
AimPrime
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 2/9/2019 | Category: | Society | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 622 times | Debate No: | 120250 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)
 Con  Pro Who are you to tel some one else how to live their life, Who are you to imose your moral views on others, As long as no one is hurt, Its no nobodies business and a fetus doesnt count a fetus is nothing |
 |
|
Con Pro according to both science and the bible a fetus is not the same as a living be=reathing person, By the bible a person is alive at first breath, In old testment the death of a fetus was a crime against PROPERTY not against a human thats a fact, By sceince life begins when the fetus is viable otside the womb not till then. And it isnt your business what epople do stop telling others how to live their lives |
 |
|
Con AimPrime forfeited this round.
Pro it isnt up to you to dictate morality to others, Part of freedom is letting people live their own lives by their own values |
 |
Post a Comment
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by billsands 3 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Faithful_Lancelot 3 years ago
Report this Comment
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Leaning 3 years ago
| AimPrime | billsands | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: I found Cons argument more convincing by how it used his point of view logic and common sense, but he failed to expand upon it, as it appears whether true or not that Pro is trolling the debate. But since there could be uncertainty if Pro is trolling or not and Con forfeited the last round without explanation, though probably because he did not feel Pro responded appropriately, I'll leave conduct tied. I am going to give Con points for spelling and grammar as Pro's is lacking. I suspect this is intentional, but it does add a bit of a rude tone to his rounds (To me). I am not familiar enough with the sources that Pro claimed and he did not leave any links or include any passages, so sources will be tied. For what thought before and after, I'd rather not say.
