Is Christianity Disadvantageous To An Individual?
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 3/26/2019 | Category: | Religion | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,466 times | Debate No: | 121011 |
I will be arguing that Christianity is not disadvantageous to an individual. This is specifically talking about the individual who goes into Christianity, Not the effect on society on a whole. The Christianity I am speaking about is the one based on the Bible (mainly the New Testament). Please don't make new rules for Christianity out of thin air, Do your best to follow the main interpretation of it (that doesn't mean Catholicism, The main interpretation of Christianity as a whole). The burden of proof is on both of us, But the claim is your job, I will just be refuting your claims. Please start your argument in the next round. Have fun! :) @speed thanks for the challenge! |
![]() |
First of all, I apologize for not being clear. I never said you couldn't use the Old Testament or extra-biblical sources, Haha, I was simply saying that the Christianity that we'll be talking about will be based in the New Testament :) The not basing it in Catholicism is true though. I mainly said that because I didn't want this debate to spiral into one about sin and what not. "Christians will dance around this subject, But the Bible is explicit when it says the only way to heaven is through belief. " This is true. "Murderers, Rapists and other dangerous individuals can live a life of sin, Yet still escape the clutches of hell simply by believing" This is not true, Read Hebrews 10:16: "For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, There no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, " "Babies or benevolent non-believers don't pass go, They just go directly to hell. " Not sure where you got the one about babies, And the one about non-believers isn't a relevant disadvantage. "If your religion is true, This is majorly disadvantageous to the non-believersfor obvious reasons. " Not sure if I wasn't clear here either, But I'm specifically talking about the believers and the effects on them, Effects on society or non-believers is irrelevant. "Almost all Christians believe their God to be omniscient and omnipotent. Free will and omniscience cannot logically coexist. " Yes, They can. Let's just say that for one second, I became omnipotent, And afterwards, The only thing that I remembered was exactly what you would say in response to this argument. Does that mean I forced you to write those words? No, I simply knew beforehand. "If the Christian God is omniscient, Then some individuals are basically living here void of choices with a predestined ticket to Hell. The concept of living in a celestial dictatorship, Void of choices, With the consequences of eternal torture is entirely immoral. " Again, This is only if free will and omniscience are mutually exclusive, Which they are not. Besides that, This is not a repercussion for the believers themselves. "If your religion is true, This is majorly disadvantageous to the people with the unfortunate destinies. " Again, This is not a negative effect for believers. "In addition to this, It causes obvious segregation issues between believers and non-believers. This can manifest in society or family structures and cause disadvantageous environments for participants. " How is segregation caused by Christianity? The Bible tells us to love everyone. "Believing in Christianity is delusional, Because it requires the individual to believe in things, Such as magic, That do not align with reality. " You haven't proved this, But I'll allow it for the sake of the argument. "This is can be majorly disadvantageous to people's careers and education, Depending on their career or education path. For example, Someone who believes magic is real will likely not be accepted for a position at NASA or any other high-ranking science organization. " This is not true, Because it is illegal to ask for one's religion in an interview. In fact, There are quite a few Christians working at NASA. Did you know that up until about 2001, NASA would pray every morning? Christianity still persists in the organization to this day. Over to you! :) Well if we're arguing Christianity ONLY from a new testament position, That by definition would exclude the old testament. Anything I would propose from the old testament would be dismissible. ---------- I intentionally saved the omniscience/free will thing for last, Because it will take the most time to rebut. If the future is a compounded result of free will based decisions, Then it’s logically impossible to know the future because the future has not been defined yet. Let’s assume Bob has two back to back decisions to make between the choices A or B. This results in 4 possible outcomes: AA, AB, BB, BA It’s impossible to know what the outcome will be until Bob has made the two decisions. If you know that Bob will choose AB, Then he was destined to make that choice and it was not a result of free will. |
![]() |
"Well if we're arguing Christianity ONLY from a new testament position, That by definition would exclude the old testament. Anything I would propose from the old testament would be dismissible. "
If you want to exclude evidence, Be my guest lol, I tried to give it to you. Again, I was simply saying that the fundamentals of Christianity, Such as the way to salvation, Must be based in the New Testament. Then again, I'm not complaining if you don't use the Old Testament :) "Are you saying that a murderer/rapist cannot repent and go to heaven? Have you forgotten about the apostle Paul and his background? Are you saying Paul is not in heaven? " This was not what I was saying. Your original response basically implied that they had this mindset: "I can get saved? Ok, I'm gonna keep murdering people until the very last minute, And then I'll accept Jesus! " That's what I was saying was not true, Not that murderers/rapists can't repent. You can't know about Jesus and his salvation and keep sinning, And then expect to get his grace at the last minute. "Babies and non-believers (including apostates) go to Hell because they lack the only criteria to go to heaven - belief. " No, Because the Bible teaches about an age of accountability. You can read of this in passages such as Isaiah 7:15-16. "I included non-believers here because these could be people who were never exposed to Christianity. " This is false. Everyone is exposed to Christianity (at leats those that come of age). In Romans 1:20, The Bible says "For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, Being understood from what has been made, So that men are without excuse. " Essentially, God reveals himself in multiple ways, Not just by word-of-mouth. "They are innocents who will suffer for eternity because they were born in the wrong area. " One, I already explained why this is false. Two, This is not a disadvantage for the people who are believing Christianity. "One example could be a Christian family that disowns their child because they are gay or atheist or _fill in the blank_. This is a very common thing, Especially among fundamentalists. " Nowhere in the Bible does it say to disown gay people or atheists, Meaning that if someone does, It is because of their own presuppositions. "It is NOT illegal to ask for one’s knowledge on a subject during an interview. As soon as they say the universe is 6 thousand years old, Radio dating doesn't work, Evolution is wrong and magic is real - they are done. " All of those are beliefs, and are illegal interview questions. Also, None of those apply to NASA jobs (that I can think of). Since when will an engineer need to know the age of the universe? And seriously, I'm pretty sure no one at NASA deals with evolution regularly. Also, Christians don't believe in macroevolution, Microevolution is obviously true. " If the future is a compounded result of free will based decisions, Then it’s logically impossible to know the future because the future has not been defined yet. Let’s assume Bob has two back to back decisions to make between the choices A or B. This results in 4 possible outcomes: AA, AB, BB, BA It’s impossible to know what the outcome will be until Bob has made the two decisions. If you know that Bob will choose AB, Then he was destined to make that choice and it was not a result of free will. " This was not what I was saying. Your original response basically implied that they had this mindset: "I can get saved? Ok, I'm gonna keep murdering people until the very last minute, And then I'll accept Jesus! " That's what I was saying was not true, Not that murderers/rapists can't repent. You can't know about Jesus and his salvation and keep sinning, And then expect to get his grace at the last minute. |
![]() |
"So, A rapist/murderer cannot repent, Fall back into sin, And repent again? One repent is all you get? " Sinning and Christianity are not mutually exclusive. Christians sin all the time, But it is a matter of working not to. If a murderer becomes a Christian and then keeps killing because they think that they'll still go to heaven, They won't. If they are actively working not to anymore, Then they can truly receive the grace of God. "This verse says nothing about getting into heaven. You are drawing a conclusion that you want from it, But it doesn't say it. " It says that there is a point at which humans don't know the difference between wrong and right, Which means that their sin is not their fault. The Bible describes animals as innocent because they don't know right from wrong either. "So, Muslims, Hindus and other people who were born/indoctrinated into their faith had an equal shot at it? " Yes. "What about the tribes on Sentinel Island? " Yes. There are reports of Jesus appearing to people in dreams in India, So why couldn't that happen on that island? Or God could simply reveal himself through the awesomeness of nature itself. "What about all the people who died before Christianity's inception? " They were under a different covenant, But belief and faith in God was still the main key point. "I never asserted it was instructed in the Bible; nonetheless, I personally know countless examples of it. " As do I, But it is irrelevant to this debate unless it pertains to Christianity. "They will be asking the metaphorical engineer loads of questions that he/she will repeatedly fail with embarrassment, Because he/she's using incorrect math and physics. If someone believes the universe is 6k years old, All of science breaks down (speed of light, Radioactive decay, Relativity, Etc), And all the existing models used in science need to be recalibrated. " Why? Like for the speed of light, I'm assuming that you'd say that the light wouldn't have reached us by now, But it's obvious that God would have made it reach us at the beginning of creation. Why would he create stars if we could never see them? "This is why every Christian in the science field has to put their lab coat on at the door and sidebar their religious nonsense. That engineer would be incapable of launching a rocket or doing anything because the physics he/she would be using would not align with reality. " I've never met a Christian whose view of physics didn't align with literally everybody else, Including myself. Please explain what you mean more. The only thing I've ever heard of being in conflict with Christianity is macroevolution. "For example, The speed of radioactive decay that we witness now (that matches up with other areas of science) would have to be multiplied by (14 billion/6k) in order to make it work in a 6k model. " Could you explain why? Please give specific examples of why it wouldn't work (and for the others if you want to keep them). I feel that I have made my points with the other arguments, So I would like to try one more point in the last round. |
![]() |
"I feel that I have made my points with the other arguments, So I would like to try one more point in the last round. " If you call a point that has been refuted multiple times made, Then sure. "1) Biblical Christian morals are disadvantageous to everyone, Including the Christian who holds them; this is why my country (US) is based on secular morals instead. " The cash in my drawer with the words "In God We Trust" says otherwise. "For example, Stoning disobedient children, Rape apology, Sanctioning of slavery, Sanctioning of murder, Etc. In Christian morality, ANYTHING God commands is an absolute moral - even murder at times. " God never commanded any of those things, They were simply suggestions and guidelines for those times, And atheists have twisted them to mean something outside of its context. And the rape apology one is completely taken out of context (by you) and incorrect. "Jesus never revoked those moral commandments, Or corrected them; in fact, He stated they should all be inforced (Matthew 5:17). " First of all, None of those were commandments. Second, I never said that he invalidated the Old Testament, So stop trying to turn that around on me. I gave you multiple chances to use the Old Testament and you decided not to. Third, We were given a new law in the New Testament in Galatians 5:14: "For all the law is fulfilled in one word, Even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. " "6k year old earth. That was easy haha" And that lol "Radiometric dating: Because we observe A decay at B, The universe must be C. Again, Creationists don't disagree with science or its models, Just macroevolution and the age of the universe.
All in all, You have not proven at all that Christianity is disadvantageous to an individual. Please vote Con. The cash in my drawer with the words "In God We Trust" says otherwise.
Thanks for the fun debate! I look forward to another (perhaps the one listed above? ) |
![]() |
Kinda salty because you saved some claims until the end. . . But it's all good
Another fun debate :)
Go ahead and challenge me to the one you put in there, I'm kinda confused as what to title it
YOUR RUNAWAY QUOTE: "Welp, This is why I try not to argue in the comments :)"
No, You do not argue in the comments section because you have a hard enough time to do it in the debate section, Therefore, Why make a continued fool of yourself in the comments section relative to your primitive barbaric faith.
Why don't you just explain it lol, You don't need their permission
means*
Also, You twisted the scripture to your mean. God told them to not the fruit, They ate the fruit. Therefore God fulfilled his word that they would die.
Fun debate once again, Although this one was super short xD
Let me know if you wanna go at it again :D