Is Jungian Typology(Myers Briggs) a reliable system for discerning people?
Debate Round Forfeited
Ariek has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 1/14/2018 | Category: | People | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Debating Period | ||
Viewed: | 310 times | Debate No: | 106704 |
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)
Round 1-Acceptance
Round 2-Cases Round 3-Rebuttals Round 4-Defense I will be defending Jungian typology as a reliable system, while my opponent will attempt to disprove its legitimacy.
Jungian typology is a method of measuring personality. It divides everyone into 16 possible categories (2^4=16). Although I am a fan of the Myers-Briggs (MBTI) I will argue against it for the sake of the argument. |
![]() |
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
![]() |
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.
Furthermore personalities adapt change over time so it's not set in stone. ie you are completely different as an old man to when you were as a youth.
Ps i am an INTP.