Is Mike Trout replacing Derek Jeter?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
NiamC
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/17/2014 | Category: | Sports | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 859 times | Debate No: | 59090 |
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)
No. Derek Jeter is still an elite player that can never be replaced.
Lol basically, what my opponent said... If you catch my drift. My opponent is Pro and should argue that Derek Jeter is being replaced, instead he has said that he can never be replaced. So once again, what my opponent said.... I accept ![]() |
![]() |
awesomesauceah forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
awesomesauceah forfeited this round.
extending |
![]() |
awesomesauceah forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
awesomesauceah forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by whiteflame 7 years ago
awesomesauceah | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Full ff.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 7 years ago
awesomesauceah | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Full FF by Pro. No real arguments were made by Con either though, hence no points for arguments but solely conduct.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 7 years ago
awesomesauceah | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by ArcTImes 7 years ago
awesomesauceah | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
awesomesauceah | NiamC | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture