Is bullet train a need for india
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
SS1105
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/28/2014 | Category: | Economics | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 3,874 times | Debate No: | 59650 | ||
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
 Con  Pro You say that we do not need bullet trains as our economy isn't developed. I simply question you-Why? I dont think that just because an economy is not developed, it should not have bullet trains. I think that to develop the Indian economy, bullet trains should be introduced as they are a sign of development. If you say that a 'not-fully-developed' economy should not have bullet trains or any other thing that accelerates its development, you are crushing its ability and its chances to develop. Taking the example of China, bullet trains have helped to develop its economy. So, according to me, India does need a bullet train to boom its economy, to accelerate its economic growth rate. |
 |
|
Con KartavyaD forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
|
Con KartavyaD forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
|
Con KartavyaD forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
|
Con KartavyaD forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| KartavyaD | SS1105 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
