The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Is there a limit to human rights implementation?How do we choose more "important" rights?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Angelina_S has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/11/2017 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 550 times Debate No: 101880
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




It's a universal truth that all Human Rights are not privileges and they cannot be granted or revoked. They are inalienable and universal. As for the question, which is stated above, it goes without saying that there is a certain limit in HR implementation. But nowadays, when international HR law is growing and deepening, we can't just shunt smb aside and demean one's genuine accomplishments. Every person is important as well as every person's right. As for "important" rights, among this category we can consider fundamental rights, which are placed on the same footing as instincts and rights, which we acquire by our birth.
But still it's very controversial issue, because the Declaration of HR is just a declaration, it's NOT a law,so it's all kind of fiction and uncertainty. And what is more in the Declaration itself,there is not equality among rights and freedoms, so what we can demand of common people...


I am happy to be a part of this debate, even if I honestly do not fully understand what exactly it is that I am pro... I am sorry for being stupid.

As I get it the main focus of this discussion will be on the issue "is there a limit to human rights implementation?", which - as my opponent clearly states - there is (if not a limit, very limiting circumstances). But are we debating the philosophical foundation of the human rights issue (like: are some human rights more important or natural than others?) or the practical issue of implementation (like: is the UDHR a bad tool to force people to treat each other decently?). It would be lovely if my opponent could somehow clarify that in the next round... In either way I am totally up for being pro.

I think this is a wonderful and very important subject, so thank you for bringing it. Maybe your goal was to debate someone totally against the human rights phenomena, and in that case I will disappoint you... I am totally a fan of most of UDHRs content. However:
- I do find some human rights questions to be more urgent than others (I would, unlike many, put the ICESCR over the ICCPR)
- I do find the international human rights law to be arbitrary and deeply problematic, and I don't see a fully functioning implementation until it has been strongly reshaped.

I hope we can work with this somehow.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.