Is there such a thing as gay religious people?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Mr.Dan
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 3/31/2014 | Category: | Religion | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 642 times | Debate No: | 51311 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)
 Con Being a Christian, of course I'm going to say no. And I stick to my word; this is mainly because like mentioned above- It makes no sense to claim you belong to a religion which strictly prohibits the sin you are committing. In a way it is offensive to people who actually belong to their religion and are repentant for their sins and don't claim to be something they clearly cannot be. I give 72 Hours to argue, I don't prefer a specific argument Atheist or not please, I want to hear your opinion.. Pro Paul ogrady is Catholic and believes in god for just one example. |
 |
|
Con Paul ogrady is Catholic and believes in god for just one example.' How does this justify your point? There are many people who claim to be religious and gay but the truth is you have to be one or the other you can't be religious and call yourself gay if you know that's not what God or Allah wants. And also how do you know Paul O'Grady doesn't just call himself a Catholic, he may calll himself one but he might not practice the religion... Pro |
 |
|
Con SaraOluk forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Cermank 7 years ago
| SaraOluk | Mr.Dan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made the only argument, and con appealed to authority in teh only point he made. Also FF.
Vote Placed by ESocialBookworm 7 years ago
| SaraOluk | Mr.Dan | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct- FF
if the homosexual finds that this particular edict is false then the homosexual is a cherry picker and is thusly inconsistent with the seminal points of said doctrine...in that case no it is not viable.