The Instigator
Pro (for)
Anonymous
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zarroette
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

Islam honors the last true muslim to leave islam

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Zarroette
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/27/2018 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 788 times Debate No: 109831
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)

 

Zarroette

Con

Thank you, vi_spex, for initiating what I am sure will be an enthralling debate.

The Burden of Proof is on Pro to affirm the resolution, and "yea" appears mildly inadequate.

I look forward to witnessing Pro affirm the resolution in the following round, so that I may have a chance to rebut.
Debate Round No. 1

Pro

no honor in killing the last true muslim because a muslim would have to do that, for it to be an honor killing.. obviusly
Zarroette

Con

My opponent argues that there is no honour in killing the last Muslim, yet the resolution pertains to proving "Islam honors the last true muslim to leave islam". It is possible that what my opponent writes is true (yet he uses no sources to verify his words) *and* the resolution remains unproven -- even if there is no honour in killing the last Muslim, this does not prove that "Islam honors the last true muslim to leave islam".

In other words, my opponent has failed to link what he writes to the resolution, thus it remains unproven.

Since the resolution remains unproven, Con wins by default.
Debate Round No. 2
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Yassine 2 years ago
Yassine
- Hahahaha... I got a headache trying to understand the resolution!
Posted by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
Who wasted Whiteflame's time with a silly appeal like that?
Posted by whiteflame 2 years ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Ragnar// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Con (Arguments). Reasons for voting decision: As con argued, BoF. Pro's entire case was one sentence and off topic. Con guided pro on offering more than "yea," but the off topic material did not achieve that.

[*Reason for non-removal*] The voter clearly explains their decision in the context of how Pro failed to meet his burden of proof (I"m guessing BoP instead of BoF?). As such, the vote is sufficient.
************************************************************************
Posted by DeletedUser 2 years ago
DeletedUser
that the case?
Posted by Aileen3310 2 years ago
Aileen3310
XD. Pro is such a troll.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
AnonymousZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: As con argued, BoF. Pro's entire case was one sentence and off topic. Con guided pro on offering more than "yea," but the off topic material did not achieve that.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.