Islamic immigration should be banned in Europe
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Adam_Godzilla
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 11/18/2018 | Category: | Religion | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 768 times | Debate No: | 119051 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)
 Pro  Con Ok. What about hot white female muslims? Imagine if Kendall Jenner became a muslim? Imagine if all the victoria secret models were all muslim. You really gonna keep them out of your country? |
 |
|
Pro Con My point is your logic is fundamentally flawed. Islam is a religion. There are billions of muslims. You have native Europeans who are muslims. Are you gonna kick out your own brothers and sisters? |
 |
|
Pro elium23 forfeited this round.
|
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
| elium23 | Adam_Godzilla | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Adam_Godzilla wins the conduct point. If Against Islam is a religion. A religion is a set of ideas. Ideas can be changed. What is the point in kicking someone out for having the wrong idea if ideas can be changed? Boiled it down like this then I would have given him the more convincing argument vote. I don't want it exactly like mine but something similar instead of "You have native Europeans who are muslims." This was not very convincing since elium could have said what does that actually mean since it was not a basis in banning immigration. I don't think if someone immigrates from Europe to somewhere outside other then Europe was what elium23 was advocating for banning since they are already a permanent citizen of Europe and it does not fit the definition of immigration: the action of coming to live permanently in a foreign country.
Instead of having your source as the homepage do this:
What is going wrong in France's prisons? (Telegraph)
You should clearly lay out your arguments.
The evidence is not the article itself only the homepage of the Telegraph.