The Instigator
BerryFinns
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
McSloth
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

Israel is right and has a right of existence where it is currently

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
McSloth
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/19/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 651 times Debate No: 118628
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

BerryFinns

Pro

I am going to let the opponent start first, But to make my point clear, I think that Israel has a right to "occupy" it's current land and is legit.
I also think that terror groups such as Hamaz should be fought and not be glorified.
McSloth

Con

Before we begin the debate proper, I would like for you to define "current lands", Does this include the lands taken in conflict? And by "right", Are you implying a moral right or a legal right?
Debate Round No. 1
BerryFinns

Pro

First, Thanks for accepting the debate!

Current lands for me means land controlled by Hamaz and the West bank. I think they have the right, And should at least occupy the Gaza strip.
Under Right, I mean that they have moral and legal right to exist and occupy already named land.
McSloth

Con

I can agree to those definitions. Considering you're the Pro in this debate, Feel free to present your arguments first.
Debate Round No. 2
BerryFinns

Pro

BerryFinns forfeited this round.
McSloth

Con

Well considering my opponent forfeited his round and didn't present any arguments to why Israel should continue to occupy lands taken in conflict. I'll just keep it simple due to fact that he can't offer a rebuttal, Israel should not occupy the contested land because it is detrimental to peace in the region. Remember vote con because he's the only one who bothered to show up after all.
Debate Round No. 3
BerryFinns

Pro

BerryFinns forfeited this round.
McSloth

Con

Argument extended, Vote con.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by billsands 3 years ago
billsands
My family left France in 1830, I returned to metz in 2014, As a guest in some one elses country not to reclaim land, Why do you think i felt that way/ maybe because i am sane and not a thief, No one told me god wanted me to have that land, I do not hear voices.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by zhaod1 3 years ago
zhaod1
BerryFinnsMcSlothTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited 2 rounds, which is poor conduct.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.