Jessica Biel's "juicy doubles" are in fact much nicer than Jennifer Lopez's
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 3/1/2008 | Category: | Society | ||
Updated: | 14 years ago | Status: | Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 2,465 times | Debate No: | 3021 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (9)
Jessica Biel booty has been very watched and has been recognized internationally as one to bang. Jessica's butt has worked hard to climb up in the rankings, moving up from #15 last year to a tie with Jennifer Lopez . It has received praise for its aligned symmetry, and its width in diameter. The experts state that Jessica Biel has the most well shaped and aerodynamic rear since Claudia Schiffer. Clearly, Jessica's buns have been cooked to perfection (if you know what i mean), if I was a pirate I'd search for her booty (if you know what I mean), and she sold terrorists her weapon of mASS destruction (if you know what I mean). But enough with the play on words, let's start with the statistics. Biel's behind was rated a whopping 69.9 on major sites and was elected best new booty of 2007 in People magazine's issue #696969. She reportedly has a T.I.W of 34.5 and a A.C.E of 57.8. Another great fact about Jessica's backdoor is that it only has 25% booty fat, compared to Jennifer's 27%. However, Jennifer Lopez does have a higher S.T.D rating than Jessica, butt that data is negligible.
In conclusion, even though the stats are there, there is no questioning that Miss Biel is the clear winner here, just by staring at that badonkadonk. Jennifer has some catching up to do as she is clearly BEHIND Jessica Biel (if you know what i mean) Thank You
I will advocate that my butt, your butt, Biel's butt, and Lopez's butt are significantly the same. Instead of trying to compare everyone and place one person above another, we should all live free from oppression man. Dig the equality. Don't be stingy and defiant to nature. That's just bad taste. I am cheekyhobo and I can see only the silhouette of people, and sometimes that is difficult. I don't judge someones butt by the size, but by the person. A butt is so much more than two flabby cheeks smacking together. You must search deeper, down to the very crevice and you must get to the bottom of it. Look to someones butt as an indication that they are also human. So all the readers, don't let the man keep you down, man... Hang loose and party ten. Peace out dawgs! - Cheeks |
![]() |
philadam forfeited this round.
Seeing as he conceded. My butt is better than his and all others are equal to mine. I hope he can find his way out of his own narrow tunnel someday. |
![]() |
what an a**, do you realize y i missed this debate argument,
because my cousin was in the hospital after a car accident and i just got home, she didnt though so y dont u care about someone else but urself cuz im very depressed right now please vote pos biels butt is way bigger
In reality, I am a bigger butt than you. I am egotistical. I am cheeky. I am nationalist. I live in cheekland and I speak cheek! Your cousin in the hospital doesn't justify missing a debate. You have 3 days to comply. If you concede, you concede. If I was unable to be at my keyboard, I would expectmy opponent to be the victor of a debate, not me. - Cheeks |
![]() |
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by DrAlexander 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Vote Placed by riddlegrl7 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by blond_guy 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Rousseau 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by birdpiercefan3334 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by SportsGuru 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Ragnar_Rahl 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by mrmatt505 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by Korezaan 14 years ago
philadam | cheekyhobo | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
what an a**, do you realize y i missed this debate argument,
because my cousin was in the hospital after a car accident and i just got home, she didnt though
so y dont u care about someone else but urself cuz im very depressed right now"
Don't blame cheekyhobo for your problems, and DON'T YOU DARE assign him the responsibility of caring for you.
"Look to someones butt as an indication that they are also human.
"
but what if it's a monkey butt?
I don't know enough of the subject to judge the validity of the claim the initiator was actually trying to make here though (having never viewed the posterior of either party).
Now where do we go from there?