The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Just Causes

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
JustCause has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/26/2018 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 500 times Debate No: 111689
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Debates are required by rules of logic to be valid and supported with facts. The endless stream of nonsense, illogical satire and ignorance has clouded many important issues, one of which is the 2nd Amendment and the issue of freedom vs. safety. There are those who say one or the other - freedom/safety - must suffer in the cause of the other. But both can exist in a free society and Republic.


Hello. I accept. I hold the position that force ought never to be used against peaceful people. (non-aggression) thus, I hold that gun control is wrong. In a dispute over behavior the side that wishes to use force has the burden of proof. Gun control is forceful, therefor those who want to enact gun control have the burden of proof.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.