The Instigator
TANTO
Pro (for)
The Contender
GEOTUS
Con (against)

Killing a pregnant Women should not be recognized as murdering 2 individual people

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
TANTO has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/10/2020 Category: Health
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 457 times Debate No: 123835
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

TANTO

Pro

In most abortion legal states killing a pregnant woman is recognized as killing 2 individual people. By there arguments, The state is saying that an unborn baby is a human and should legally be considered one. If a doctor can willingly kill an unborn baby without being charged with murder then why should we charge a murder with killing 2 separate beings? I'm anti-abortion inchase you were wondering.
GEOTUS

Con

Your argument isn't exactly a solid one, In my opinion. However, I myself am not an expert on this topic matter. Regardless, I'll try my best. The reason most states say that life starts before birth is so there's a boundary for some abortions. If life doesn't start before birth, When the child is pretty close to looking like a small human form (if not already), When does it start? Birth? When one develops a memory? The heartbeat/pulse is what we often associate with life. It is often emphasized by whenever you check your pulse, Are checking someone else's pulse after spending a lot of time dying in some things as common as showers, Or like in the movie San Andreas. So, Does being conceived cancel that out? I think not. Think about this: at one time, You were one of these children, Living through the umbilical cord that attached you to your mother. Does the fact that you were smaller than my hand make you any less alive? No. If the child has a body, That means he or she has organisms, Which means they have a heart and if they have a heart, It's like a rule of thumb that only recently has been challenged. Out of all due respect, If you're anti-abortion, Why are you asking this and sounding like you're pro-choice?
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Leaning 1 year ago
Leaning
I 'would have guessed pro abortion.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.