The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

LGBTA is wrong?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
044APD has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/8/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 557 times Debate No: 102953
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)




I think, We don't have right to hate LGBTA . because LGBTA natural thing and LGBTA is not disease


First, people have the right of freedom of speech, which means that people have the right to their opinion about LGBTA. Nevertheless, someone cannot simply say LGBTA is a natural thing without first providing a definition of natural. According to the Oxford Dictionary, the definition of natural is, "In accordance with nature." I will make a point that, in accordance with nature, LGBTA is not natural. Life on earth has bean created through the natural process of reproduction. Without that, life on earth as we know it wouldn't be able to exist. Therefore LGBTA isn't natural because there is no need of it in our world and there is no natural product, which is at the end of every natural process. Lastly, I would like to say that whether something is a disease or not doesn't change whether it is right or wrong. For example, people can get diseases through the natural process of eating, or something like that. From a religious perspective, LGBTA is wrong, but to conclude, LGBTA is wrong because it deprives people of their sexuality and takes away what they were made for, to give existence to new beings.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by G_Skeptic-Guy 2 years ago
Can you be more specific and add more details?
Posted by Arganger 2 years ago
Asexual I don't really think can be classified as a gender...

And everyone has a right to hate anyone, but disagreeing with the idea of more than three genders (Male, Female, Biologically neither) isn't the same as hate.
Posted by EXOPrimal 2 years ago
Diseases are natural, technically.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.