The Instigator
andrea.trevisiol
Pro (for)
The Contender
NKJVPrewrather
Con (against)

Law suit for unpaid bet

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
andrea.trevisiol has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/16/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 245 times Debate No: 108163
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

andrea.trevisiol

Pro

There is a situation where a person bet against another one $100. The reason was that if they took the highway on the way back home, the other person would've given him $100.
At this point, the way back home was the highway so the losing person should've given the other one $100 being that he lost.
This didn't happen, because it was debated that the other person didn't remember him that they entered the highway so he forgot and it is not fair for him to pay $100.
What do you think?
NKJVPrewrather

Con

Unless a legal contract was signbed, being a dick is noit a liability.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.