Math challenge
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
RainbowDash52
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 6/19/2014 | Category: | Miscellaneous | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 910 times | Debate No: | 56876 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (2)
The first round is for acceptance.
The second round I will post a positive whole number. The challenge: Post 2 positive whole numbers that when multiplied together equal the number I posted in the second round. Neither of those numbers can be the number 1. The first to complete the challenge wins. I can't complete the challenge the same round I post the number so my opponent gets the first chance to complete the challenge. If nobody is able to complete the challenge, my opponent wins.
I accept. |
![]() |
number: 2411667898559004051960186229162734322671742088617359089845931334671
|
![]() |
My opponent's numbers don't meet the challenge. You can use this http://web2.0calc.com... to check if his two numbers work, which they don't.
These numbers do complete the challenge: 937748634966726163746318950483273, 2571763699388990842068052197183127 Again you can use this http://web2.0calc.com... to verify my numbers do work. Just copy past the 2 numbers in with * in between and press the equals button on the calculator. You will see the result is the number I posted for the challenge. I am the first to complete the challenge. Vote for me.
Yes, I essentially have no justification here, so I can't really ask you to vote for me except out of a sense of dadaism. |
![]() |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
RainbowDash52 | Surrealism | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 5 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by tylergraham95 7 years ago
RainbowDash52 | Surrealism | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: The Pro met the challenge.
Designing a number made by two large prime numbers is more difficult than simply looking up two extremely large primes and multiplying them together.