"My dick is bigger than yours." - Matt Damon
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
JohnMaynardKeynes
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/4/2014 | Category: | Miscellaneous | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,182 times | Debate No: | 59969 | ||
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (4)
Votes (6)
 Pro Con has provided no parameters as to this debate, so we are to assume it is a normative resolution and thus shared BP. He has provided no reasoning against this resolution, so his BOP is unfulfilled. C1) Morality is subjective, so there is no objective basis to say that this remark was "wrong." C2) Matt Damon is awesome -- see Good Will Hunting or his rant against Sarah Palin. C3) The comment is probably true. If not, it could be a challenge or a troll attempt, both of which are acceptable. |
 |
Post a Comment
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Aerogant 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Ragnar 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Wylted 7 years ago
Report this Comment
Posted by Ragnar 7 years ago
Report this Comment
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
| Aerogant | JohnMaynardKeynes | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't really make an argument.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| Aerogant | JohnMaynardKeynes | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro proved the quote is acceptable.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
| Aerogant | JohnMaynardKeynes | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: con did nothing
Vote Placed by Ragnar 7 years ago
| Aerogant | JohnMaynardKeynes | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Probably did not, but pro is unchallenged.
Vote Placed by GOP 7 years ago
| Aerogant | JohnMaynardKeynes | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 3 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the BoP, and he did not fulfill it. Pro's job was to prove that the quote was from Matt Damon, and he failed to do that. I think he shouldn't have accepted this debate to begin with, but he could have won it if he just cited something (like an image of Matt Damon with the quote as a caption as mentioned by Ragnar).
Even though that could easily be refuted, Con would have no way of arguing back since this debate only contains one round. Hence, I think Con won this debate. Pro's arguments are largely irrelevant.
Vote Placed by ESocialBookworm 7 years ago
| Aerogant | JohnMaynardKeynes | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro actually provided arguments.
