National Socialism - The Answer
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Sonofcharl
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 10/27/2018 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 620 times | Debate No: | 118741 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)
 Pro What made a once ravaged state of Germans into an empire of a united and organised people intertwined all by a passionate leadership. Grown out of the dusts of a lost war, Adolf Hitler repurposed the German people and paved the way for a perfect society and world. With his war lost, Europe's fallen. The world's fallen to neo-Judaist globalists who are well-situated at the top as aristocrats and beneath them a society of disunity and backwards fascism. The world needs organisation and the history of National Socialism proves right to it all. From its roots to now, Its doctrine remains untarnished. All of what was done under the National Socialist government of Germany was reasonable and righteous. Talk to me. I'll educate you. Con Notwithstanding the short lived shambolic chaos you are referring to. A) Socialism is an unachievable utopia. Socialism instantly collapses into some form of hierarchical and authoritarian social structure. B) Nationalism is nationalism whereas empiricism was empiricism. C) Who or what, Ultimately is the judge of righteousness? . . . . . . Do you think that it is the person pointing the gun? The thing is: Jews are normally, Quite a rational and peaceful group of people. Whereas extreme right wing nationalists usually have a tendency towards psychopathy. I know which group of people I would prefer to live next door to. |
 |
|
Pro emfaws forfeited this round.
|
 |
|
Pro emfaws forfeited this round.
Con |
 |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by ConserativeDemocrat 3 years ago
| emfaws | Sonofcharl | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Pro concedes the final 2 rounds, so Con wins conduct.
Arguments: Due to Pro's forfeits, Con's counters are dropped, meaning Con wins.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
| emfaws | Sonofcharl | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff over half of the rounds. That's poor conduct.
How was murdering Jews reasonable or Justified?
As far as I know the Nazi's were the aggressor and the Jews were not breaking any laws.
I think you must believe the ends justify the means. No matter what happens in the journey the end goal is the only thing that matters. Even if what the Nazi's were doing was wrong. How is race a real justification who is superior?
Socialism is tarnished. Everyone in the society are equally poor.