The Instigator
emfaws
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Sonofcharl
Con (against)
Winning
5 Points

National Socialism - The Answer

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Sonofcharl
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/27/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 620 times Debate No: 118741
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

emfaws

Pro

National Socialism.

What made a once ravaged state of Germans into an empire of a united and organised people intertwined all by a passionate leadership. Grown out of the dusts of a lost war, Adolf Hitler repurposed the German people and paved the way for a perfect society and world. With his war lost, Europe's fallen. The world's fallen to neo-Judaist globalists who are well-situated at the top as aristocrats and beneath them a society of disunity and backwards fascism.

The world needs organisation and the history of National Socialism proves right to it all. From its roots to now, Its doctrine remains untarnished. All of what was done under the National Socialist government of Germany was reasonable and righteous.

Talk to me. I'll educate you.
Sonofcharl

Con

Hello.

Notwithstanding the short lived shambolic chaos you are referring to.

A) Socialism is an unachievable utopia. Socialism instantly collapses into some form of hierarchical and authoritarian social structure.

B) Nationalism is nationalism whereas empiricism was empiricism.

C) Who or what, Ultimately is the judge of righteousness? . . . . . . Do you think that it is the person pointing the gun?

The thing is: Jews are normally, Quite a rational and peaceful group of people. Whereas extreme right wing nationalists usually
have a tendency towards psychopathy.

I know which group of people I would prefer to live next door to.
Debate Round No. 1
emfaws

Pro

emfaws forfeited this round.
Sonofcharl

Con

Yet another forfeiter.

Kids!
Debate Round No. 2
emfaws

Pro

emfaws forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by kwbc 3 years ago
kwbc
Is that why Nazi Germany lasted a little under 12 years? Lol. You guys are adorably stupid. If you want to go full retard and praise an actually successful empire, Try the British empire, Ottoman empire, Prussia, America, Portugal, Spain, France, Mongolia and china. Not some losers
Posted by McSloth 3 years ago
McSloth
Always happy to see a Nazi come out of their cave and rant about the "neo-Judaist globalists", Good luck debating this guy Sonofcharl. Nazi's are not know for their ability to logic and reason after all.
Posted by omar2345 3 years ago
omar2345
@emfaws

How was murdering Jews reasonable or Justified?
As far as I know the Nazi's were the aggressor and the Jews were not breaking any laws.

I think you must believe the ends justify the means. No matter what happens in the journey the end goal is the only thing that matters. Even if what the Nazi's were doing was wrong. How is race a real justification who is superior?

Socialism is tarnished. Everyone in the society are equally poor.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by ConserativeDemocrat 3 years ago
ConserativeDemocrat
emfawsSonofcharlTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Pro concedes the final 2 rounds, so Con wins conduct. Arguments: Due to Pro's forfeits, Con's counters are dropped, meaning Con wins.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
dsjpk5
emfawsSonofcharlTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff over half of the rounds. That's poor conduct.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.