No debate is new
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
FuzzyCatPotato
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 8/4/2014 | Category: | Miscellaneous | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 861 times | Debate No: | 59974 |
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)
Thank you, Pro. --- BOP Pro has the burden of proof (BOP) in this debate, because they must assert something to be true, while Con doesn't have to assert anything. As such, unless Pro proves the resolution true, Con wins. Pro has provided no arguments, and hence Con wins. --- Counter-Argument New means "just beginning" (1). It is possible for a debate to begin; hence, at some point all debates were "just beginning". --- References (1) google.com/search?q=definition+new |
![]() |
Post a Comment
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Aerogant 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Wylted 7 years ago

Report this Comment
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
Aerogant | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually made an argument.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
Aerogant | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: pro did nothing
Vote Placed by schachdame 7 years ago
Aerogant | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments, resulting in a complete BOP failure. These debates seem suicidal.
Vote Placed by Domr 7 years ago
Aerogant | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has made no arguments objectively, or subjectively towards any sort of topic.
Vote Placed by KhalifV 7 years ago
Aerogant | FuzzyCatPotato | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con refuted pro's points and offered arguments