The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
6 Points

Not all Screamo is satanic

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/12/2014 Category: Music
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,311 times Debate No: 56509
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




Not all screamo music is satanic because of it's loud sound. Some of it probably is, but there are christian screamo bands such as Blessthefall, Before Their Eyes, Spoken, etc. Screamo may be loud and obnoxious to some, but others may find peace from it and it may let them escape the world and get their mind off of everything.


Thanks to my opponent for an interesting debate topic. I decided to add a youtube video for you to listen to while you read.

In this debate my position will be that every Screamo bad is definitely not Satanic.

Let me also add these definitions for the readers:
Satanic: of, relating to, or worshipping the Devil (1)
Devil: the most powerful spirit of evil in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam who is often represented as the ruler of hell (2)

Additionally, Screamo can be any band my opponent wants to argue for that could possibly be Satanic.

I hand the debate over to my opponent for opening arguments.

Debate Round No. 1


I'm sorry, but I don't understand how you disagree with me.


I apologize, it seems I have confused my opponent.

My position is that no screamo band is Satanic. This contrasts your position that some screamo bands are"Some of it probably is, but there are christian screamo bands".

I will now add an argument, so that my opponent has something to reply to in the final debate round.

I feel confident to say no screamo bands are Satanic, as for these bands to be Satanic they have to be devil, or Satan, worshippers. As such my opponent needs to prove these bands are firstly devil worshippers.

Secondly and more importantly my opponent needs to prove the existence of Satan.

Only if my opponent can prove these two points above is it possible to win this debate.

I hand the debate back to my opponent.

Debate Round No. 2


I'm very impressed with your argument, although there are many satanic "Screamo" songs.

I don't have to prove that the devil is real to prove that people worship him.

A Kingdom at War - Aye, I am a LaVeyan Satanist. Varg Vikernes (AKA Burzum) was a Pagan. Not a Satanist. He killed Euronymous, who was widely known as a Satanist, and Vikernes himself was known to be anti-Satanist.


Thanks to my opponent for a fun debate.

My opponent says it is not necessary to prove Satan exists for someone to worship said person or god. On the contrary I would say its highly important to prove something is real to worship it. If some one worships aliens, we would consider them delusional as the general consensus of the public is that aliens do not exist.

The following point about LeVeyan Satanism while interesting is irrelevant as LeVeyanism Satanism is just a form of atheism.(1) Atheism is the position that there is no evidence for a God or hence Satan.

I believe that I have made a case that all screamo bands are in fact not Satanic. Additionally, my opponent has not met the burden of proof in this debate.

Thanks to my opponent for the debate and now over to the voters.

Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Gogert777 7 years ago
What an adversary...
Posted by numberwang 7 years ago
What is your definition of screamo?

spoken and blessthefall are metalcore, and before their eyes is hardcore. Just because there is screaming in music doesn't make it screamo, and it's pretty annoying (to me) when people make that generalization.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by nikidavis 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct goes to Con because he made much more arguments. Spelling and grammar is a tie because they both had good spelling and grammar except for one mistake on each side. Convincing arguments goes to Con because he provide much more good points than Pro. Reliable sources goes to Con because Pro missed some sources that she needed to cite.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.