The Instigator
Pro (for)
21 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Obama be getting $hit done bitchez

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: Select Winner
Started: 6/22/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,034 times Debate No: 56720
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (3)




First round is acceptance ma LG's. Temple streetz representz fu. We ain't never get beaten by no white boy tofu. Obama nation fu, he be given us all sorts of free stuff bra.

Taken those gunz away from the competition, naw what I saying and all.


- No rules in the hood dog. Every nigga for himself.

- Con goes first, naw exceptions



LOL! feeling the music

Anyways i accept =)
Debate Round No. 1


ChosenWolff forfeited this round.


Obama don't get crap done. I see him spending more time playing basketballin the back of the white house than being productive in making this a better country. He then defend his reputation rather thandeal withiss ues like a real leader. I sorry, but his motivational "yes we can " not only sound corny, but he didn't live up to his word. He changed it to "yes we can, but it's going to be very very hard before it is going to get better "no crap sherlock, I think martin Luther King Jr make a better president. When are things going to get better? 3013?
Debate Round No. 2


I. Stock Investment has raised 140%

We all remember the stock market crash during the Bush regime, but under Obama, our investment within the Stock Exchange and NASDAQ is up 140%, which means 140% more shares are getting bought since the Bush regime, which means not only is the economy growing, but at an extremely fast rate. 1000's of companies are recieving stimulus from fellow investors, at not cost to the taxpayer.

II. Obama has got the economy rolling

During the Bush regime, the GDP fell 8%, and remained like that for pretty much the whole presidency. Under Obama, the economy has almost recovered the lost 8% under bush, and a couple months a go, we were projected for 3% growth in our GDP. Whether that's still holds true is irrelavant. The economy is soaring above the international developed average.

III. Unemployment Pre-regime levels

We have now officially recovered all employment since before the recession. That is about 3% from where we tanked in 2007, with unemployment from 9% to 6%, and on way to reach 5%, or the goal line.

IV. Affordable Care Act

Obama has brought 8 million people into buying healthcare, making it affordable, and stimulating the insurance market all at no expedenture to the government or taxpayers.

V. Conclusion

Obama has accomplished $hit, whether it's enough, is up to you. Unless the OP can refute all these claims with a BOP premise requirement, then he has failed to negate the BOP.


Obama has not accomplished much in comparison to other more experienced presidents. Obamamakes us pay forhea lth care whereas in Canada, it's free. Not to mention that rights are being taken away.
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by ChosenWolff 7 years ago
Damn right NZ. Bama be a man with a cause, bra. Naw what I saying?
Posted by ChosenWolff 7 years ago
I said niggas ain't have no rules in the hood
Posted by AlexanderOc 7 years ago
Why are you making Con go first? You have BoP and have yet to make any argument for Con to rebut. It is you job to Prove "Obama be getting $hit done bitchez", it is not Con's job to prove that he isn't "getting $hit done bitchez" only refute your claims that he is.
Posted by n7 7 years ago
Daaaaaamn dis debat look lik it gona be dah SHlT.

Bama be a true bruda.
Posted by ChosenWolff 7 years ago
Can we do this debate quickly? My argument will take 15 minutes to 20.
Posted by ChosenWolff 7 years ago
This is not a troll debate BTW
Posted by Fanath 7 years ago
Suck it prog.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
Who won the debate:Vote Checkmark-
Reasons for voting decision: con really didn't give much compared to pro
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 7 years ago
Who won the debate:Vote Checkmark-
Reasons for voting decision: Tough decision. There were no grammar rules. Pro did ff one round, but came back strong with a ton of evidence. Pro had more sources.
Vote Placed by MrJosh 7 years ago
Who won the debate:Vote Checkmark-
Reasons for voting decision: PRO won because he backed up his claim with evidence;; CON did not refute the evidence and didn't really make a counter-argument.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.