The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Obama is a muslim

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/6/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 606 times Debate No: 82186
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)




He helps ISIS a lot. He seems to do nothing for us Americans. Prove me wrong please. Don't forget his middle name too!


Debate accepted.

Firstly, I'd note that as the instigator Pro has the BoP that he/she has ultimately failed to fulfil in this single round.

In fact, absolutely no evidence for Obama [I.E the current president of the U.S] has been provided.

Simply using his name as an example is not classified as viable proof due to the fact that a name does *not* necessarily dictate to ones religion.

In addition there's many people of African, Asian, and Middle Eastern origin that have similar names that do not identify with the Muslim faith. Another example is that Jews can have the name 'Barak'--discounting the 'C'.

As for ISIS, this claim is again unsupported.

On the basis of their resolution and roumd one statement, the position of Pro is thus negated.
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Emilrose 3 years ago
Posted by kasmic 3 years ago
His name!?
Posted by dsjpk5 3 years ago
Pro has bop here.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: As Con pointed out, Pro had the burden of proof as the instigator and by being Pro. Also, as Con pointed out, both of Pro's arguments were baseless. Since Con negated all of Pro's arguments, arguments go to Con.