Obamacare
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
CoolPeppers12
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 4/1/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 1,172 times | Debate No: | 51434 | ||
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)
 Con  Pro Children of parents will get health care until they turn 26 years old! That's very good. Many people who want to get health care or insurance cannot afford it because the "big" companies are so crooked. So that is why the Affordable Health Care is there! Read this link I shared. It shows all the upside to Obamacare. http://obamacarefacts.com... |
 |
|
Con 1) I doubt the law is Constitutional in the first place on the individual mandate. Ruling's on such issues are subject to change, based on the justices. The court held it as a tax, so guess what.. another lie Obama told. I make less than 50,000 a year and now I have to pay higher taxes. Pro Obamacare is here to stay, and we and YOU cannot get rid of it, because it is what we have. President Obama did not tell a lie, I do understand where you got that information from. And, do you really have to pay higher taxes? Anyway, Obamacare is still a good health care. One of my family members could not afford any health care of which was available around her. It was too expensive. Obamacare! |
 |
|
Con 2) Affordable is subject to interpretation by the individual. Most of the support fell fast when people got sicker shock on the prices. They found the free lunch wasn't free as they are rich as far as Obama sees it. The main reason less than 25 % of Americans wasn't it now and less 2% of Americans signed up. Pro Nothing wrong with hospitals providing care to patients who have no insurince. What happens if a homeless man doesn't have any healthcare and he gets hit by a car? No, not 2% of Americans signed up for Obamacare. Did you hear that about 7 million people signed up. At first, i thought Obamacare would've been a flop, but it wasn't. |
 |
|
Con The government has no right to mandate . Pro And if someone is poor, cannot pay for their own medical bills because the US hospitals are demanding for BIG amounts of money, I do not see the problem with the Affordable Health Care "giving" people health care. Because, some one who is actually poor and not able to afford health care, do you think it is the smartest idea to refuse. |
 |
|
Con frankienstien forfeited this round.
Pro |
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 7 years ago
| frankienstien | CoolPeppers12 | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Rather than responding when caught insisting poor people should not receive medical care, con conceded conduct. ... Unconvinced by either side on the actual argument.
The resolution is clear: "Obamacare is here to stay", and Con is Con.
What seems to be the problem?
Con wants to argue that Obamacare is not here to stay, because Obama is allegedly using this "propaganda" to weaken his opposition.
It's not about whether Obamaare should be abolished. Con clearly says it will not last ANYWAY, as it's all hot air.
Pro would have to argue that Obamacare is a solid concept and will outlast the Obama administration.
I think Obama is using propaganda to falsify its effects, and I will be argueing Obamacare should be abolished.