On balance, Animals should not be killed for human consumption
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Leaning
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 11/15/2018 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,003 times | Debate No: | 119001 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (1)
Resolution: On balance, Eating meat is immoral. The BoP is shared, With Pro presenting arguments that on balance, Humans should stop eating meat and Con presenting arguments that humans should continue eating meat. Definitions: On balance: In general; on the norm
Sure, I'll accept these terms. Though I'm also going to go to sleep after posting this round 1. I'll reply to round 2 in about 6-10 hours, Or when you finish it. |
![]() |
Topaet forfeited this round.
Hmm, Well it's another day. |
![]() |
Topaet forfeited this round.
Ah, Well, I would say not to bother voting on this debate, Was nothing debated. 2 3 4 And now, On to the reposting of subpar poetry. -Before Dawn Comes- Falling moon in the ink blue sky Silver streaks of stars guide your way This moment enjoy before day breaks And we night owls sleep to reawake Once morrows passed over those nocturnal When again vanity hangs framed on black Shining once more suns reflection, Mans mirror. |
![]() |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by zhaod1 3 years ago
Topaet | Leaning | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited 2 rounds, which is poor conduct.
Somehow your point escapes me. Do you disagree with the words "On balance"? And feel that it should be a more one way or the other? Definitively right or definitively wrong?
The debate should be "Eating meat is immoral". If you are asserting/assuming as FACT that eating meat is immoral, Then I would argue one shouldn't eat meat (See first paragraph above). However, I don't believe it is a Truth (fact) that eating meat is immoral.
It's a nuance,