PROOF that theoretical mathematics and physics are WRONG!!! I separate mathematics into three types:
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
farm3r
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/2/2014 | Category: | Religion | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 2,109 times | Debate No: | 58454 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (4)
PROOF that theoretical mathematics and physics are WRONG!!!
I separate mathematics into three types: Theomathematics, real-world mathematics, and "theoretical" mathematics. Theomathematics is made up from what God tells us (like Pi = 3). This is the only branch that is without a doubt correct. Real world mathematics is what we deal with on a daily basis. I use this to maximize profits for Christian companies. We use it when we purchase something or count (1+1). Then there is "theoretical" mathematics...this is what the liberal EVILutionists try to force on us. It is a tool of SATAN. However, in the world of homosexual "science," if there is ONE flaw, JUST ONE, then it is proven incorrect. I HAVE FOUND THAT FLAW!! Here it is: If you were to add up all the positive integers (1+2+3+4+5+6+7+...) all the way to infinite, what do you think that would equal? Logically, it just goes to infinite. We would say that it diverges to infinite and this can be shown through a divergence test which is used by those evil "scientists." Well I have a proof that shows that this sum actually equals -1/12. That is crazy! Because those satanists say that it diverges! Well guess what? There "math" also shows that it CONVERGES to -1/12!! A series CANNOT be convergent and divergent!! This is something I have worked on for quite some time. I have knowledge in their "field" so that I could prove them wrong. I have defeated one of SATAN'S TRICKS!!! Now that this is proven wrong, several sciences will collapse as well including physics and chemistry. TRUE CHRISTIANS ALWAYS WIN! SHOUT GLORY!!!! PRAISE THE __________________ And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: it was round all about, and his height was five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about. 1 Kings 7:23 Opening My opponent is claiming that he can prove both theoretical mathematics and physics are wrong. This is obviously a bold claim, and I sincerely hope my opponent can win this debate so we can usher in a new age of correct mathematics and physics. It would be the finding of the century. Burden of proof is obviously on Pro, but I am sure he will be able to fulfill this burden. For this opening, I will simply lay out the groundwork of physics and 'theoretical mathematics'. Being a layman myself, please excuse my lack of sophistication and understanding on such a complex topic, I will only go over the basics of what my opponent has to disprove. Theoretical Mathematics While my opponent has outlined what 'Theomathematics' and 'Real-world mathematics' are, he has yet to explain 'Theoretical mathematics', other than claiming that "it is what the liberal EVILutionists try to force on us. It is a tool of SATAN.' Now, this is an incredibly strong claim. My opponent will first have to prove that 'Satan' definitely exists, and that evoltuionists are evil, which I am sure he will be able to do. Moving on to the definition. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I can tell, 'Theoretical mathematics' seems to be the same as 'Pure mathematics', as per Google. Now, Pure Mathematics is the study of abstract concepts, and was the basis of many things; physics, astronomy, engineering, etc.[1] What this means, in fact, is that 'Pure mathematics/Theoretical mathematics' does not consist solely of a set of definitive laws, but rather, is simply a branch of Mathematics responsible for the derivation of theories. In order for my opponent to meet his burden of proof, he will therefore have to disprove every single theory in Pure mathematics. Physics Physics is incredibly complex and responsible for a large number of physical discoveries and applications, including the way cars move, gravity, and the nuclear bomb. It would be a monumental discovery if my opponent was able to disprove the entire branch of physics (which is what he is trying to do as per resolution). There are numerous theories that my opponent has to disprove, as many of these theories are independent of each other. However, for starters, I simply challenge my opponent to disprove Einstein's theory of relativity, the big bang, and quantum chemistry. My opponent's argument My opponent says that if there is just 'one flaw', then it is proven incorrect. He has done his research guys - he is indeed correct! However, this is only true for one specific theory or idea; it does not extend to the entire branch of Mathematics/Physics. Having said that, I am having trouble understanding his infinite converging diverging sequence of numbers. I ask you to excuse my ignorance in this matter, but which specific theory does your converging diverging sequence disprove? And what about the other thousands of theories? In summation, I wish my opponent luck in his endeavours and urge him to continue his research on our quest to discover a new turning point of modern maths and physics. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org... [2] http://en.wikipedia.org...; |
![]() |
nazi
I would like voters to note that my opponent has called me a 'nazi', but has failed to provide any evidence to support such a claim. I take great offence in such a derogatory and demeaning term, especially since I am Jewish. |
![]() |
TRUECRISTIAN forfeited this round.
|
![]() |
Post a Comment
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by farm3r 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by TRUECRISTIAN 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by ArcTImes 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by TRUECRISTIAN 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by POPOO5560 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by POPOO5560 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by ArcTImes 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Randomosity 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Envisage 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by KhalifV 7 years ago

Report this Comment
12Next »
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
TRUECRISTIAN | farm3r | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: troll + ff.
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
TRUECRISTIAN | farm3r | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Ajab 7 years ago
TRUECRISTIAN | farm3r | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: ...nazi, need I say more?
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 7 years ago
TRUECRISTIAN | farm3r | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: TC failed to make anything but incoherent unsubstantiated assertions, and stormed off. Point distribution is obvious.