People Who 'Know How To Play Chess' Are Just Pretending
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Sonofcharl
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 1/11/2019 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 431 times | Debate No: | 119847 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)
 Pro Con |
 |
|
Pro ThisSiteTrash_uPPLrTrash forfeited this round.
Con |
 |
|
Pro ThisSiteTrash_uPPLrTrash forfeited this round.
Con |
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by omar2345 3 years ago
| ThisSiteTrash_uPPLrTrash | Sonofcharl | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro gave claims. Con did not give an argument. Con expected Pro to answer his/her question in the next Round but Pro forfeited. I don't consider a question an argument so Con only gets conduct which should be enough for him to win.
I am a chess player (not professionally or anything, I just know how to play)
If you mean that chess has no strategy involved, I would say it takes at least as much strategic thinking as a clash royale game of whatever that game's called. It's not a very realistic representation of how actual battle works, But neither are health bars or an arrow to the head only taking half HP.