Pepsi better than coca cola

Coca cola tastes better but its run by Zionist Jews, Pepsi last longer and tastes better when flat and also helps with digestion drink with meal and you will be on the shitter in less than 5 minutes guaranteed .

Prediction
Pepsi wins by flying knee round 2

Referee- irn bru

Burden of Proof

The burden of proof clearly rests solely upon Pro within this debate, as they are attempting to prove that Pepsi is better than Coca Cola, while Con must not prove anything, merely cast doubt upon Pro's arguments.

As such, if Pro fails to prove that Pepsi is better than Coca Cola, then Con wins.

---

Objectivity

In order to prove that Pepsi is better than Coca Cola, Pro must provide (an) objective method(s) of measuring "better" and (a) valid reason(s) for its/their adoption. This is because the resolution is an objective statement, rather than a subjective statement, and requires objective proof.

As such, if Pro fails to provide (an) objective method(s) of measuring "better" and (a) valid reason(s) for its/their adoption, then Con wins.

---

Rebuttals:

A: Pro: "Coca cola tastes better"
1: Pro must first prove this to be true.
2: Pro must provide (A) a reason why this is not valid ground for objectively considering Coca Cola better (or is valid for considering it worse), and/or (B) a reason why other points outweigh this one.

B: Pro: "Coca cola ... run by Zionist Jews"
1: See A1.
2: See A2.

C: Pro: "Pepsi last longer"
1: See A1.
2: See A2.
3: Please note the grammatical error; "last" should be singular.

D: Pro: "Pepsi ... tastes better when flat"
1: See A1.
2: See A2.
3: This contradicts Pro's statement A. If, as Pro asserts, "Coca cola tastes better", then it *always* tastes better. However, statement D asserts that *sometimes* Coca Cola tastes worse. Only one can be correct.

E: Pro: "Pepsi ... helps with digestion drink with meal and you will be on the sh!tter in less than 5 minutes guaranteed ."
1: See A1.
2: See A2.
3: Please note the grammatical error; "digestion drink" should be "digestion; drink" or similar.
4: Please note the curse word-involving "sh!tter".
5: Please note the grammatical error; "guaranteed ." should be "guaranteed."

---

Summary:

Pro has failed to provide an objective method of measurement and thus fails Pro's burden of proof; hence, Con is winning.

My opponent forfeited this round.

Please extend my arguments.

My opponent has forfeited this rond.

Extend my arguments.

---

Summary:

Conduct: Clear Con vote. Pro ff'd all rounds and was offensive.

Grammar: Clear Con vote. Pro had many grammatical errors.

Arguments: Clear Con vote. Pro had BOP and failed to fulfill it.

Sources: No vote. Both Pro and Con had no sources.