The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Pepsi is better then Dr.peper

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2016 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 428 times Debate No: 90568
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




Pepsi is way better then Dr.peper!!


nope dr pepper is better
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by CAHAL101 2 years ago
im so lost with this debate
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the burden of proof. He asserted that Pepsi is better than Dr Pepper. Con asserted that it isn't. Given that this puts me in a stale mate the result is that I view neither side as being victorious in advancing any form of a burden. Though the resolution is phrased as a positive claim therefore giving Pro a larger burden. Given that Pro was unable to fulfill his burden he loses. Con had a smaller burden so the fact that his was unfulfilled meant that the impact was larger on Pro. Therefore we can conclude, from the burdens analysis, that Pro's burden is larger and it went unfulfilled. Due to this fact I vote Con.