Pizza Rocks My World

Piza iz da bestest food! It iz amazin an it tasts good.

An asss me frend mynameisjonas wuld say, End O' Storiee

Greetings. First, I'd like to thank my opponent for starting this debate. Second, I'd like to request that voters vote on who provided better arguments.

With that said, let us proceed:

Ladies and gentleman, the burden of proof belongs to my opponent; my opponent must conclusively prove that pizza rocks his world. Now I know what you're thinking: Since he stated that pizza rocks his world, it must be true. However (and respectfully), your presumptions are misguided here. Him stating something about his personal life in a debate that directly concerns the validity of his personal life is not to be considered valid evidence. Besides, another reason such evidence is faulty is that I could merely counter it by claiming that I've met my opponent in real life and know that pizza does not rock his world. In both cases, you would have to take our words at face value.

I believe that there is an objective means of solving my opponent's conundrum. He can drive to my location (which is listed in my profile)(I will set up further instructions via email) and I can have two or three of my campus psychologists mentally examine my opponent. They can examine him and conduct multiple tests that will lead them to the conclusion as to whether or not pizza really rocks my opponent's world. After they conduct their tests, they can posts their results online and you can confirm for yourselves that my opponent was involved in their study.

Again, the burden of proof belongs to my opponent and nothing within his opening argument constitutes as evidence.

As for my position, I'm going to advocate that pizza might rock my opponent's world. This position conflicts with my opponent's since my opponent is advocating certainty.

I now stand ready for my opponent's first rebuttal.

Logical Master, i c that yoo haf acceptid my debit. No dout it iz so dat u cann mak up 4 declining my chalengez twice en a roow.

Now dat you haff acceptid one uv my debates, eye will show you how teh secund best debatour en this sight (meening mii) willl crush teh turd best debatour on dis sight (meening tu)

First uff, eye wuld like to show you sum piktures uv pizza:
1. http://www.michigan-fundraising.com...
2. http://www.davidos375pizza.com...
3. http://www.personal.psu.edu...

As yu kan see, thees r al piktures uv pizza, and im shure that they loook reely gud to many peeple

It iz a figur uv speach. It dus not litterally rock me, butt i reely likee it. Tuns uv peeple luv pizza.

Read about teh history of piza heer: http://en.wikipedia.org... if theyre iz a history of pizza as big asss dat, it must bee populer.

En a closing statment, eye would like two haf yu go to http://en.wikipedia.org... and read about Pizza in general

Pizza!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

My opponent starts off by providing some pictures of pizza. Although these pictures look mouth watering, I must object by claiming that they hold absolutely no significance on whether or not Pizza rocks my opponent's world.

My opponent then attempts to correct me by claiming that "pizza rocking his world" is a figure of speech, but if you've read round one, you know that I never even claimed that it was not a figure of speed. My argument was that it was my opponent's burden to prove he liked pizza and that merely claiming that he liked pizza would not be sufficient evidence for an online debate.

My opponent then cites a wikipedia article that talks about the history of pizza, but this is yet again a citation which has nothing to do with the argument. Therefore, I urge you to dismiss it.
Finally, my opponent closes by suggesting that I go read yet another wikipedia article which talks about pizza, but like the previous citations, this has nothing to do with the resolution.

So basically, my opponent does not address my arguments (nor the actual topic for that matter), so you can extend everything I said in the previous round and dismiss everything my opponent said in this round.

I now stand waiting for my opponent's final rebuttal.

rite theyre, yu admit that you liek pizza. You sed that they look mouthwatering, which means that you like it. Actually, they doo haf significance, because this debate is about pizza and they r pics uv piza.

Your wrong! Teh histery of pizza does have sumthing 2 do wif this debate, becuz iff theyre iz a history such as pizza's, then it muzt bee important.

You say i didnot adress anyfing yu sed, welll y wuld eye want to? Yu told mii to go finnd yu, im sry, butt dats a wee bit creepy.

Here iz a definition of Pizza from dictionary.com: Pizza: a flat, open-faced baked pie of Italian origin, consisting of a thin layer of bread dough topped with spiced tomato sauce and cheese, often garnished with anchovies, sausage slices, mushrooms, etc.

Asss you can c, pizza iz actuilly pretty healthy for you, as it hass multiple food groops. Dairy(the cheese), Grain(the crust), Vegetables(mushrooms), Fruit(pinapples and sauce) Meat/Protein(Sausages, Pepperoni, Anchovies)

Actually Mr. Imsogood instead of saying dat eye donut haff enugh proof to proove that pizza is good, why dont yu proove to mii dat it isnt, 4 iff you dunt, i win this debate, because you are not going aganst me (asss you admitted pizza's good) you are simplee asking me for my reesons without haffing any of ur own.

End O' Storiee

I'll wrap this one up quick.

First, my opponent states that I admit that I like pizza, but this is completely irrelevant. As you can see, the topic concerns whether or not my opponent likes Pizza.

My opponent suggests that the history of pizza must be relevant to this debate, but does not provide any evidence for this statement, so you are free to dismiss it.

My opponent demands that I explain why he would want to address anything I've said.

My answer: It is the job of both debaters to address ALL objections made against their stance.

I told my opponent to go about the method I had listed in my opening argument because it was one of the only ways to present credible objective evidence that would prove he liked pizza. My opponent has refused to do this and has refused to present any valid evidence in this round (for that matter), so he has gone without supporting his case.

My opponent submits a definition of pizza, but this definition has nothing to do with what he is attempting to prove, so you're free to dismiss it.

Next, my opponent attempts to shift the burden of proof by demanding that I prove that pizza isn't' good. First, this is misleading as the goal of the debate concerns whether or not my opponent really considers pizza to figuratively rock his world. Second, it is his burden to prove that it does. Furthermore, I've clearly outlined my stance in my opening argument. I am advocating that pizza MIGHT rock my opponent's world; I'm in favor of possibility whereas my opponent is in favor of certainty. My argument for this has been that there is a lack of empirical evidence to be observed in this channel where we are debating.

Reason to vote con: My opponent has not defended his case and has basically produced irrelevant information in all of his rounds. At the same time, I provided reasons to support my stance. Thus, I urge you to vote con.

Thank you.