The Instigator
Minddagger
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
kidwinter
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Pro is a bad debater

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Minddagger
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/13/2018 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 647 times Debate No: 110669
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (9)
Votes (2)

 

Minddagger

Con

No, pro is not, he debates fine
kidwinter

Pro

i am not a bad debater. Give me proof if you think so
Debate Round No. 1
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
You don"t judge his debate skill with the arguments you judge who has the most logical arguments so no making the best argument ever would not disqualify pro from winning this debate
Posted by MasterMewtwo 2 years ago
MasterMewtwo
It's possible to win this if Pro said "I am a bad debater", though making a proper argument would be tricky (since making too good of an argument makes you a good debater, and too bad of an argument might not support the premise). Probably if you throw in a bunch of fallacies, you'd win.
Posted by WOLF.J 2 years ago
WOLF.J
pro is just a kid, my point proven!
Posted by Minddagger 2 years ago
Minddagger
You accepted the debate as pro, which means that you were debating for the fact you were a bad debater
Posted by WOLF.J 2 years ago
WOLF.J
who does she/he think he/she is?! the muppets
Posted by WOLF.J 2 years ago
WOLF.J
who da fuq is pro anyway
Posted by WOLF.J 2 years ago
WOLF.J
I agree
Posted by WOLF.J 2 years ago
WOLF.J
a cunt indeed
Posted by WOLF.J 2 years ago
WOLF.J
pro is cunt
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
MinddaggerkidwinterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro concedes that he isn?t bad
Vote Placed by MagicAintReal 2 years ago
MagicAintReal
MinddaggerkidwinterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro concedes he is not a bad debater, therefore arguments to Con. This was a tricky, sneaky, and slimy way to get a win, and I couldn't be prouder, props to Con for the easy win.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.