The Instigator
Con (against)
3 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
10 Points

R-rated movies should be banned from television.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/18/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,004 times Debate No: 52893
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)




We shouldn't ban them. Parents should block those channels so that their kids don't see them on television. (This does not include televisions that have internet access)


R-Rated movies wouldn't bring in enough revenue for a channel to survive on a commercial basis.

Those who are into that kind of movie must legally be adults and therefore should go an purchase the DVD themselves, rather than pay for a channel where more than 50% of the viewers are not there for blood, guts and gore and those who are would rather see it beginning to end rather than on a channel, 20 minutes in.

The small minority of people who would love to regularly view their television on a channel that streams R-rated movies over and over on a loop should not only get their heads checked but also learn to use the Internet.

It is economically unfeasible for R-rated channels to survive in the long run because there's simply not large enough a market for it.

Banning the channels as a policy prevents idiots taking up a channel number where a far more sustainable content is being displayed.
Debate Round No. 1


I certainly agree with you.
Debate Round No. 2


BUT I fail to see what your statement has to do with the original argument. You are off topic.


Your failure to see the relevance has cost you this debate.

In conclusion, there is no practical reason whatsoever to not ban R-rated channels and thus it is sensible to ban them.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by LostintheEcho1498 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:33 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had a sentence structure error and a few errors. The second sentence in round 1 is quite awkward. Otherwise Pro did make a more convincing argument but neither used sources but I will give it to Con because of the previous vote. Pro may deserve the convincing argument but not the sources.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: con conceded, all points to pro

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.