The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Raising Minimum Wage

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
senshred19 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/8/2016 Category: Economics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 729 times Debate No: 95267
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)




My opponent challenged me to this debate based off another debate regarding this topic. I will be using the same arguments from that debate and expanding on those points.

There is historical evidence that raising minimum wage is detrimental to companies. I will start off this debate by pointing out three facts:

1. Raising minimum wage causes companies to to either cut employees or cut hours. Most companies either do not have it in their budget to pay the difference when minimum wage is increased, or they refuse to increase their budgets. Therefore, many companies will hire fewer people to compensate for the higher wages. Other companies have a tendency to cut hours. Just because someone is making $10/hour instead of $7, it doesn't mean that they will be offered the hours desired to see a difference.

2. Raising minimum wage increases costs. For companies that do not cut employees or hours, they are forced to raise prices to compensate for the extra money being spent on payroll. There is a reason that prices have soared for many consumer products in recent is because minimum wage keeps increasing. In order to balance their budget, most companies have to charge higher prices to compensate.

3. Raising minimum wage kills competition for jobs. There are two possible consequences if minimum wage reaches the desired $15/hour that many cities and states are fighting for. Most of these jobs require very little skill and/or little to no education. Therefore, this is either going to cause other careers to raise their wages or many will pass by college to get a job that will pay close to the same without the student loan debt. Why would someone go to college for 4 or 5 years and be put $100,000 in debt to work a job that pays just a little more than a career with no education experience required. Either way, it will start a ripple effect across the entire economy.

I will provide more resources to prove my position as the debate progresses into the next rounds.


Thank you to my opponent for creating this debate.

Although he hasn't stated it in this thread I'm assuming the position he is defending and I am attacking is the same as the previous one where I challanged him, where he states his "position is that I am against raising the minimum wage any higher than it already is" and I should show why it should be raised.

Although he states here "There is historical evidence that raising minimum wage is detrimental to companies." I'm assuming this isn't the basis of debate as his very first reflect doesn't reflect on the impact on companies but rather on society as a whole. Companies care about their profit margins (which he brings up seperately in point two), but in his first point he only raises the issues for employees. Companies don't have reason to care how many employees they have or what hours they work as long as it's profitable, so I think it's clear he's already looking at this from a wider perspective of society as a whole.

Senshred's Claims

Senshred puts forward a few claims, but does not support them with evidence. Instead he bases his claims on what he views as the outcome of companie raising the minimum wage.

However his model of how he looks at the effects is simplistic and does not factor in most of of the effects of raising the minimum wage. For instance he only views the minimum wage increase as a cost on businesses but he does not factor in what happens to the extra money the people on minimum wage get. In his scenarios they might as well burn it.

However if people have more money, then they are also spending more money. How do people spend money? They give it to companies in exchange for commodities.

The money paid to the employees in wages comes back to the companies in purchases. Indeed, this is exactly what Henry Ford did voluntarily to stimulate demand for his own products. While people said he would be bankrupting himself, he succesfully expanded his business with the benefits accorded to paying his workers higher wages. [1]

Indeed there are a host of factors for why the way minimum wage increases work not only minimises any cost but can benefit businesses. In his 2013 report Why Does the Minimum Wage Have No Discernible Effect on Employment? For the Center for Economic and Policy research, John Schmitt set out 11 potential channels which factor into why raising the minimum wage is not forcing businesses to cut employment or go bust as a result of minimum wage increases[1].

Indeed, one of the possible channels for this is by decreaseing hours, which is overall a positive rather than a negative as Senshred tries to claim:

"If firms were to adjust entirely by cutting hours (that is, they used no other adjustment channel), a minimum-wage increase could still raise the living standard of minimum-wage workers, even in a competitive model of the labor market. Imagine, for example, that the minimum wage increased wages by 20 percent and lowered the number of hours worked by 10 percent. A part-time worker working, say 20 hours per week, would experience a 10 percent fall in hours to, 18 hours a week, but would be paid 20 percent more for each of these 18 hours worked, for a net increase in weekly pay of 8 percent. Even if the reduction in hours was so large that it exactly offset the increase in the hourly wage, minimum-wage workers would still be better off after the increase because they would be earning exactly what they made before, but would now be working fewer hours per week to earn it."

As Senshred's claims are not backed up by sources and his personal analysis of the economic situaiton is too basic to be relied upon and doesn't include a whole host of key factors, there is therefore no evidence or argument to support Senshred's claims.

The Reality

For the last couple of decades as the effects of minimum wage have been intensely studied, the consensus has been that there is no scientifically significant evidence for the negative effects of typical minimum wage increases and indeed reason to think it will have an overall positive impact.

In 2012 an analysis by the IMF, World Bank, OECD and ILO found that for G20 countries “a statutory minimum wage set at an appropriate level may raise labour force participation at the margin, without adversely affecting demand, thus having a net positive impact especially for workers weakly attached to the labour market”.[3]

The 2013 study by Cooper and Hall found that "Using these same standard fiscal multipliers... we find that increasing the national minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10 per hour by July 1, 2015, would result in a net increase in economic activity of approximately $32.6 billion over the phase-in period, and over that period would generate approximately 140,000 new jobs".

Indeed, it is actually expected that minimum wages could and should be higher. Businesses and productivity as a whole have obviously grown over the decades since the most recent US Federal minimum wage was introduced. Why then have minimum wage workers not benefitted?

As shown by this graph based on data collected by scientific studies of official data, productivity has increased massively since 1968 and if minimum wage workers were paid just been paid at the same rate equal to the increases in productivity, they would now be on $18 dollars per hour. hell, even if they just had the same average pay increase as normal workers, they'd still be on a lot higher than they are now.

As shown, businesses are perfectly able to pay workers more. not only that but paying workers more would benefit the economy as a whole. Furthermore it would increase the money that goes towards the most needy and hardest off in our community, fulfilling one of our basic idea of fairness and how people should be compensated for work[5]

There is no reason that the minimum wage should be held back at its current level. Even if someoen were blind to all the overwhelming evidence and the economic rationale behind it, it would be immoral not to increase minimum wage in line with the overall growth of the economy. As it is, once inflation is taken into account people on minimum wage getting are actually getting paid less each year. hell, they're paid less than people on minimum wage 50 years ago![6]

Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Overhead 2 years ago
There's no way to continue this debate. However you can always start a new debate with 1 less round and in your opening post just link back here with an instruction for voters to include our arguments here in their scoring and to count the new debate as a continuation of this one.

Or you can cede defeat :D
Posted by senshred19 2 years ago
Ok, so I ran out of time this weekend and did not respond in time. Whenever someone has forfeited in previous debates with me, the system has never reset to finish the debate. So does this mean that the debate is over?
Posted by senshred19 2 years ago
I made the change
Posted by Overhead 2 years ago
Hey, would it be possible to do it with a 10k character limit rather than 5k? I just find 5k a bit constrained.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.