The Instigator
Jukebox101
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points
The Contender
YeshuaBought
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

Rapture Theology (Premilenialism)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Jukebox101
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/25/2019 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 491 times Debate No: 120490
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (9)
Votes (1)

 

Jukebox101

Con

I propose that the idea of a rapture is not biblical, And therefore premillenialism is flawed as well. My opponent will need to show scriptural evidence (along with logic) for a rapture before the millenium. I will be arguing from an ammillenial point of view. In this round, Pro can argue some points, Or wait for me.
YeshuaBought

Pro

I am a post tribulational rapturist, And want to provide some evidence, Which you can find in your Bible. I will use the King James Version of the Bible, Cool? Mark 13: https://www. Biblegateway. Com/passage/? Search=mark+13&version=KJV
Matthew 24, And pay close attention to verses 29-31: https://www. Biblegateway. Com/passage/? Search=matthew+24&version=KJV Verse 29 talks about after the tribulation of those days, And you can read the whole thing to see the gathering together of the elect, Which is the rapture. Wait, There's more: https://www. Biblegateway. Com/passage/? Search=+1+thessalonians+4&version=KJV So you see, There is a rapture, It is just post trib. More evidence:
https://www. Biblegateway. Com/passage/? Search=2+thessalonians+2&version=KJV Verses 1-12 talk about the post tribe rapture. This: https://www. Biblegateway. Com/passage/? Search=1+corinthians+15&version=KJV chapter contains a verse which talks about in the twinkling of an eye, We who believe shall all be saved. Finally: https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=3IHBrLUYj5g&t=2314s The preceeding video is more evidence of the post trib rapture.
Debate Round No. 1
Jukebox101

Con

I was hoping to debate a premillenialist, So I will not participate in this one. You may have good arguments, But this is not what I was looking for, I hope you understand.

Soli Deo Gloria,

Juke
YeshuaBought

Pro

YeshuaBought forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
YeshuaBought

Pro

YeshuaBought forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
YeshuaBought

Pro

YeshuaBought forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
YeshuaBought

Pro

YeshuaBought forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by Eugenious 3 years ago
Eugenious
This is definitely an interesting topic, And I appreciate the view that the rapture is not Biblical, And that pre- millenialism is just not Biblically accurate. Not many people hold this view.
Posted by Speedrace 3 years ago
Speedrace
Alrighty, Cool, Just send me a message when you're ready
Posted by Jukebox101 3 years ago
Jukebox101
@speedrace ok, Can we debate next week, I am kind of busy. And, Yes, I am aware of the left behind series, But I think there are still problems with the theology.
Posted by Speedrace 3 years ago
Speedrace
This debate doesn't apply to you @WrickItRalph or @killshot since you're atheists.
Posted by Speedrace 3 years ago
Speedrace
I'll debate you on this @Jukebox since you don't like debating YeshuaBought
Posted by Speedrace 3 years ago
Speedrace
That is most definitely not true. Have you read the Left Behind series? It explains the whole ordeal in quite a bit of detail.
Posted by Jukebox101 3 years ago
Jukebox101
No, I propose that the millennium mentioned is symbolic of a time period that we are in now, That began when Christ resurrected (which is the amillenial view).
Posted by WrickItRalph 3 years ago
WrickItRalph
Do you mean the millennium that already passed?
Posted by killshot 3 years ago
killshot
Most of the stuff in the doctrine came from other neighboring beliefs and religions. So what?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
dsjpk5
Jukebox101YeshuaBoughtTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff over half of the rounds. That's poor conduct.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.