Resolved: Hitler is Worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Raymond_Reddington
| Voting Style: | Open with Elo Restrictions | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 7/21/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 3,590 times | Debate No: | 59061 | ||
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (32)
Votes (5)
 Pro BoP is on me to demonstrate that Adolf Hitler is worthy of a posthumous Nobel Peace Prize. Quick and easy debate! 4,000 Words, 72 hours. Round 1: Acceptance & Rules Round 2: Arguments & Rebuttals Round 3: Arguments & Rebuttal Round 4: Closing Rebuttals (no new arguments/brand new rebuttals) No semantics. Good Luck! |
 |
|
Pro I'm really sorry, I wish you best of luck in the finals. Please vote Con.  Con Anyway, let's just post to finish the debate. Best of luck on your other debates! |
 |
|
Pro Con (http://scientopia.org...) |
 |
|
Pro Con |
 |
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
| Envisage | Raymond_Reddington | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - |  | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Concession. Good luck, Raymond.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
| Envisage | Raymond_Reddington | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: concession
Vote Placed by Ragnar 7 years ago
| Envisage | Raymond_Reddington | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Concession... Interestingly, the peace prize has gone to men who are arguably worse than Hitler (certainly no better), such as Yasser Arafat in an attempt to encourage him to be less of a terrorist (anyone want to bet how many suicide bombings the prize money funded?)
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 7 years ago
| Envisage | Raymond_Reddington | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Concession
Vote Placed by Daltonian 7 years ago
| Envisage | Raymond_Reddington | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments, no sources, no grammar mistakes, so I'll just give con his conduct point :)
I don't know why one would want to put themselves through Men Kampf, but I reckon we are almost equal on our knowledge of the man, perhaps you more so.
However, the argument you present would cause you to share a BoP, which automatically makes it a weaker argument. All one has to do is refute the claim that Adolf Hitler is worthy of a Nobel Peace Prize, to win the debate, and Pro has the full BoP for that.
I also have the highest ELO of those who want to debate it. I haven't debated too much recently, but this would be a good comeback for me. :)
I've read that book, plus Mein Kampf and the Leuchter report, three times. :P pick me, I'll be arguing that Adolf Eichmann is more worthy than Adolf Hitler.
Pick me!!!