Resolved: The United States should build a border wall along the southern border
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Rockytop
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 2/13/2019 | Category: | Politics | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 513 times | Debate No: | 120292 | ||
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (1)
 Con Round 1: Pro has the burden of proof so they will be the first to argue. Note: All Pro's arguments must be only in this round. No new arguments can be brought in after this. Round 2: First rebuttal Round 3: Second rebuttal Round 4: Third rebuttal Round 5: Final rebuttals and closing statements  Pro Round 2: Why the wall is necessary Round 3: What has Mexico done for the U. S. Round 4: Why Mexico should pay for the wall. Round 5: Conclusion |
 |
|
Con Pro these_republicans forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Con Pro these_republicans forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Con Rockytop forfeited this round.
Pro these_republicans forfeited this round. |
 |
|
Con Rockytop forfeited this round.
Pro these_republicans forfeited this round. |
 |
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by timmyjames 3 years ago
| Rockytop | these_republicans | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: |  | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | | - | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited.
In addition to clarify, I think your set up is quite clear. Pro, I would advise that you follow con's structure as that is what you agree on by accepting the debate.
To Truth! -logicae
Why? The maker of the debate decides the rules, If you don't like it, Don't join. Also, Even though I don't agree pro, I think discussing this issue in parts makes this debate more objective.
To Truth! -logicae