Scientology is dumb
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
LifeMeansGodIsGood
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 6/8/2014 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,749 times | Debate No: | 56278 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (14)
Votes (2)
Con must explain why Scientology is not dumb, Con is expected to make the first arguement in Round 1 with acceptance of the Debate Challenge. Burden of Proof will be on Pro to show that Scientology is dumb. If Pro is too funny in showing Scientology is dumb, Pro must concede that he is too funny.
I am glad that you started this debate, I will take it that round one is acceptance so I accept to this debate, me (pro) must argue that Scientology is not dumb. There is one thing I'd like to say and that is about how dumb the rules are..... Anyhow lets get this show on the road shall' we? |
![]() |
You are Con, you are supposed to be telling me why Scientology is not dumb. Please explain to me how Scientology is not dumb. I say it is dumb. That is my opening arguement. I guess I lose since burden of proof is on me to show Scientology is dumb, if you don't pose any argument as to why it is not dumb so I can show how dumb your assertion of Scientology not being dumb is. If Scientology is not dumb, please tell me how it is not dumb. If you will not tell me how it is not dumb, and I say it is dumb, then at least I said somehing about it when you are saying nothing. It seems to me that you could expllain how Scientology is not dumb and you would be happy to do so if you really believe it's not dumb.........but maybe you really think it's dumb and I just can't prove it. Dumb means silent....no speaking. If you say nothing, you are being dumb. I say scientology is dumb and that is why you are saying nothing trying to show how it is not dumb.
Cryes forfeited this round. |
![]() |
Scientology started as a struggling science fiction writer turned one of his sci-fi novels into a religion, teaching that what happened in the novel is real in everyday life. The author was told if he wanted to succeed, his books were not making it and if he started a religion then he could make some real money from it and he did.......so people really believe that space aliens are taking over their bodies and they give away their money in hope of getting delivered from the aliens and to spread the messge of this silliness which they actually fell for and it's dumb.
Cryes forfeited this round. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by Minnesotan 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by LifeMeansGodIsGood 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by 9spaceking 7 years ago

Report this Comment
Posted by iamanatheistandthisiswhy 7 years ago

Report this Comment
12Next »
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Sagey 7 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood | Cryes | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con Forfeited leaving Pro the Points, and a Conduct Bonus, and without an argument.
Vote Placed by Themba 7 years ago
LifeMeansGodIsGood | Cryes | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 1 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: FF.