Seeking a discussion rather than a debate regarding the existince of reality.
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
intellectuallyprimitive
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 4/3/2014 | Category: | Philosophy | ||
| Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 695 times | Debate No: | 51524 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)
 Pro  Con |
 |
|
Pro I am fairly convinced reality does exist however, It is conceivable the inverse may be suggested as well. Rather than assert that reality is indeed a robust model of utility, I desire to discuss a method of substantiating that reality exists or that reality may not exist. Con 1 the kinda person u r discussing with 2 ur own and the other person's intellect 3 the most important point is to scrutinize a decoy. mostly, in a discussion or in a debate, one would contradict to the existing reality moreover this world has far much more number of talkers than the listeners |
 |
|
Pro Con loveneet_bangar forfeited this round. |
 |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Zaradi 7 years ago
Report this Comment
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 7 years ago
| intellectuallyprimitive | loveneet_bangar | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - |  | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | | - | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 4 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited, Pro wins.
