The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Should All Government Services be Privatised

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
tatertot464 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/12/2018 Category: Economics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 495 times Debate No: 106663
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)




I believe that we can strengthen the American economy by making police, fire, jails, and other government services owned by private businesses. These businesses would be regulated to make sure that they are acting fairly and they could not form any partnerships with other businesses. Instead of allowing the government to get bigger and bigger, private services would receive government contracts to work in an area. This way, taxes could be lowered and only those who worry that a fire could happen or a crime would happen to them would pay.


There's no reason this would strengthen the economy or be better in any way.

How do private business (vs government) strengthen the economy? Government is a reliable buyer of goods and services. In many places the government is the largest buyer. Government is also a predictable employer. Taxes essentially force spending on basics, which is good for the economy. So shrinking government would weaken the economy.

You are setting up a system of negative incentives. For instance, these private services could charge more when there's greater risk of crime or fire and would suffer in safer environments -- an obvious conflict of interests. How many investigations and lawsuits would be required to discover that the police service is enabling or tolerating criminals to keep demand up? Therefore you need to police the police. Very inefficient.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by tatertot464 2 years ago
When you fail to check your email on a daily basis.

You forfeit debates.
Posted by be11e 2 years ago
"could not form any partnerships with other businesses" Does this mean they cannot invest in other companies or sell stock? This would limit their ability to grow, profit, and finance operations. Would they be restricted from lobbying? This would also put them at a financial disadvantage compared with other companies who can.

I don't understand how this would be paid for. Can you elaborate on that?
Posted by Pill_Junkie_Monkey 2 years ago
But muh roooads!
Posted by DrCereal 2 years ago
What do you mean by "should"?
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.