Should Israel continue operation protective edge?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Rational_Thinker9119
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 8/2/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 991 times | Debate No: | 59864 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)
Operation protective edge has been going on for over three weeks right now, should israel continue the operation and why?
Operation Protective Edge is causing the unneeded deaths of innocent women and children. They could do pin-point shots, or put troops on the ground instead of shellings and this would lower the the civilian death rate; this does not occur with regards to Protective Edge. Since one should never continue the unneeded deaths of innocent people, then Isreal should not continue with OPE. |
![]() |
Johnny1428 forfeited this round.
Rational_Thinker9119 forfeited this round. |
![]() |
Johnny1428 forfeited this round.
Rational_Thinker9119 forfeited this round. |
![]() |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Kc1999 7 years ago
Johnny1428 | Rational_Thinker9119 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con presented arguments. Pro presented questions.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
Johnny1428 | Rational_Thinker9119 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: equal ff, but con at least had one assertion
Look at the top debaters, how they frame an argument and present a debate. I love choosenwolf for his debates and presenting them. Lifemeansgodisgod is great for looking at what not to debate (you can see him off my debate list). doomswatter is great at debates as well, though he usually responds.
Generally you present a term or claim "there is a god" "its wrong for isreal to bomb pal". . . if there is a term that might not be clear, quote it or reference it, Set the terms for winning, or bop. . .
It's just that it's my first debate here, and im not familiar with the mechanics yet, i thought that text box was a description of the debate, and i was wrong.