The Instigator
Con (against)
4 Points
The Contender
Pro (for)
0 Points

Should Native American Caricatures and Names be used as Team Mascots?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/1/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 707 times Debate No: 53793
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




it is a slap in the face no matter what the intentions are by society who gives the Right to the MAN who can say your a symbol.. NO WE ARE NOT A SYMBOL WE ARE A PEOPLE. It degrades an entire race of people based on their heritage which brings to light the meaning behind Redskins.. it was a reference used to refer to American Indians or Native Americans as a racial slur.. REDSKINS.. Also to refer to the scalps that were taken when there was a bounty on us during the genocide that happened ..the racist caricatures are mocking us ... much like the black face that they wore in the early 19th century to mock African Americans its the same thing..and its a shame that in all the ignorance and cultural sensitivity that MY people have to still deal with this . It promotes people to dress up like Indians wearing sacred items like its a joke... the eagle feathers & the head dress... the paint on the face.. all sacred ... THERES NO RESPECT.


i have no idea what your talking aboot, but i will tell you that my dog. who is rabbit is really scary, he is fixed and owns guns. bug ricos pizza can cure rabbies though. the pacts of dogs can fight with kick boxing and knife work. remember what the wise man ceicil said: guns dont kill people, its impossible to be killed by a gun, we're all invinsible to bullets and its a miracle. forget everything you have learned and join the jungle peopel who sind dubstep. i win. no exceptions.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 2Sense 7 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: This sounded like an interesting topic to debate. Too bad Pro didn't take it seriously.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.