Should Pluto be considered a planet again?
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
killshot
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 2/5/2019 | Category: | Science | ||
| Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
| Viewed: | 577 times | Debate No: | 120183 | ||
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
 Pro  Con |
 |
|
Pro Zack5046 forfeited this round.
Con |
 |
|
Pro Zack5046 forfeited this round.
|
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Leaning 3 years ago
| Zack5046 | killshot | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: |  | - | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 4 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited rounds without explanation, loss of conduct. Pro failed to expand argument with the 'why we should call Pluto a planet despite not meeting definition. Con argument made sense, that it does not make sense to call something other than what it is. I still like the idea of calling Pluto a planet though, somehow a little bit. Just that sense of knowing something one way for so long, it does not bother a person especially to wander into the nonsensical.
