The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Should Sadiq Khan stand down as mayor of London

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Aeden_r has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/22/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 756 times Debate No: 101255
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Should mr sadiq khan stand down from his current role as mayor of London due to the recent attacks in London


No, Sadiq Khan should not stand down.

Unless Pro wants to present evidence that Mr. Khan aided or abetted this attack, it's not clear why Pro thinks Mr. Khan is such a poor mayor of London that he should step down.

In particular, Pro should explain whether [a] they think that every mayor of every city in which mass violence has occurred should step down or [b] they think that Sadiq Khan is a particularly poor mayor.
Debate Round No. 1


I can understand your perspective but I quote "terorist attacks are part of the parcel of living in London and we could not of prevented it" not once did he console the dead post attacks let's say you are a relative of one of the deceased what would you say


Actually, that quote is from last year:

He elaborated:

"It is a reality I'm afraid that London, New York, other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things. That means being vigilant, having a police force that is in touch with communities, it means the security services being ready, but also it means exchanging ideas and best practice."


[1] He doesn't seem to be callously ignoring the victims -- he seems to be saying that "we should prepare and try to minimize the badness of the next attack". (Obviously, this is a very difficult job: the US has had 16 years of antiterrorism activities since 9/11 and yet still faces domestic and foreign terror attacks.)

[2] Regardless of the first point: If a mayor makes a callous remark, should they step down? Or should mayors be evaluated on what they do rather than what they say?
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.