Should South Africa begin to invade the rest of Africa
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
ChosenWolff
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 7/22/2014 | Category: | Politics | ||
Updated: | 7 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 1,193 times | Debate No: | 59389 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (6)
South Africa should invade the rest of Africa because it is the only country in Africa with the military and economic resources to develop the rest of Africa there by spreading peace within these African nations.
|
![]() |
So I win.
No, that just means I'm accepting your challenge. You may begin your arguments mate. |
![]() |
Ever since the European imperialists left Africa to its own demise, Africa has been riddled with civil unrest, multiple human rights violations and war between nations. But only one nation avoids all of this; South Africa. They have the highest GDP by far of any African nation. They are also the only nation to detonate a nuclear weapon. They have never had any form of civil unrest or human rights violations. It is only there duty to provide the rest of Africa with this.
South Africa should invade the rest of Africa because it is the only country in Africa with the military and economic resources to develop the rest of Africa there by spreading peace within these African nations. 1) The South African military isn't the strongest in Africa. Egypt, Ethiopia, and Libya all have larger power indexes than South Africa. I doubt that South Africa could invade and hold even one country, much less 45 + of them. http://www.globalfirepower.com... 2) South Africa doesn't even have enough money for its people. The average citizen gets 100 claories less than the International Food Standard. Africa doesn't have enough food for its own people, much less a prolonged war. The military and economy would be exhausted in a week. South Africa's military isn't built to sustain offensive operations. 3) South Africa doesn't even have the highest GDP, once again outweighed by Nigeria. The nation still suffers from poverty, rampant crime, and tribal revolts. It is the best of 45 + terrible nations http://en.wikipedia.org...(nominal) http://africacheck.org... But only one nation avoids all of this; South Africa 1) False, for reasons I stated above. South Africa also has terrible corruption problems http://www.nytimes.com... They are also the only nation to detonate a nuclear weapon 1) False. Russia, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, United Kingdom, United States, Russia, France, Iran, and China all host and have detonated nuclear weapons. 2) South Africa is the only nation stupid enough to violate the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty They have never had any form of civil unrest or human rights violations 1) Completely false. Homosexuals and Zulu splinter tribes are often beaten, murdered, and raped by civilians. The problem is our of control and uncontained. http://www.hrw.org... |
![]() |
Post a Comment
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by lefillegal1 7 years ago

Report this Comment
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 7 years ago
Titanicexpert | ChosenWolff | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: con backed up arguments with sources
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 7 years ago
Titanicexpert | ChosenWolff | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 2 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con proved war would fail.
Vote Placed by Conservative101 7 years ago
Titanicexpert | ChosenWolff | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con used better arguments to support him. His reasoning was good and he found proper sources.
Vote Placed by dynamicduodebaters 7 years ago
Titanicexpert | ChosenWolff | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Reasons for voting decision: Sources, Rebuttals
Vote Placed by lannan13 7 years ago
Titanicexpert | ChosenWolff | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con backed his argument with sources which increased it's viability.
Vote Placed by Romanii 7 years ago
Titanicexpert | ChosenWolff | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con showed that Pro's justification for South Africa conquering the rest of Africa is based on factually inaccurate premises, thus negating the resolution.